The rugged smartphone market caters to a specific user: those needing a device that can withstand drops, dust, and the elements. The Doogee T40 and Cat S62 Pro both aim to deliver this, but they take different approaches. The T40 focuses on modern chipset efficiency and extended battery life, while the S62 Pro relies on a more established, though older, Qualcomm platform. This comparison dives deep into the specs to determine which phone truly reigns supreme for demanding environments.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and modern performance, the Doogee T40 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset offers a significant efficiency advantage over the aging Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro, translating to a remarkable 78.25-hour endurance. While the S62 Pro has a brand reputation, the T40 delivers more for the money.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, aluminum alloy back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 256.5 x 168 x 7.6 mm (10.10 x 6.61 x 0.30 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 530 g (1.17 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| | - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m
MIL-STD-810H compliant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
Reverse wired | - |
| Type | 8580 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | Black |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 78:25h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (52 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee T40
- Exceptional battery life (78.25h endurance)
- Modern and efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Reverse wired charging for added convenience
- Display details are unknown, potentially a weak point
- Brand recognition is lower than Cat
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Solid build quality expected from Cat devices
- Potentially better software support (historically)
- Aging Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Likely lower battery life compared to the Doogee T40
- Less efficient 14nm process node
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details are missing, but given the rugged focus, expect both to prioritize durability over visual fidelity. The absence of high refresh rates is likely. The key difference will be in brightness; a higher nit count on either would improve outdoor visibility. We can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels given the price points and ruggedization requirements, which typically avoid the fragility of OLED.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus should be on practical utility rather than flagship-level photography. Given the rugged nature of these phones, image processing will likely prioritize clarity and dynamic range in challenging conditions. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset advantage of the T40 *could* translate to better image processing capabilities, especially in low-light scenarios. We can assume both will offer basic camera functionality suitable for documentation and quick snapshots.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee T40’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is a significantly more modern design than the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node of the G99 translates to superior power efficiency and improved thermal management. While both are octa-core CPUs with similar clock speeds (2.2 GHz peak), the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores offer a performance advantage over the S62 Pro’s Kryo 260 Gold cores. This means the T40 will handle multitasking and demanding apps more smoothly. The older Snapdragon 660 will likely show its age in more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
This is where the Doogee T40 truly shines. Its 78.25-hour endurance is exceptional, a direct result of the efficient Helio G99 chipset. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Snapdragon 660 is known to be less power-efficient. The T40’s 18W charging is standard for this segment, and the inclusion of reverse wired charging adds a useful convenience feature. The S62 Pro’s charging speed is likely similar, but the larger battery drain will mean longer charge times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee T40 if you need exceptional battery life for extended fieldwork, travel, or simply dislike frequent charging. It’s ideal for users who prioritize a responsive experience for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you value a well-established brand with a proven track record in the rugged phone space and are less concerned with having the latest processor or longest battery life. It’s a solid choice for those who need a reliable, albeit older, workhorse.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Doogee T40 struggle with graphically intensive games?
While not a flagship gaming chip, the Helio G99 is capable of handling most mobile games at medium settings. Its efficiency means it will sustain performance for longer periods than the Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro, which is more prone to throttling under sustained load. Expect playable frame rates in titles like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile.
❓ How does the ruggedization of the Doogee T40 compare to the Cat S62 Pro, given Cat's established reputation?
While Cat has a long history in rugged devices, Doogee has significantly improved its build quality in recent years. Both phones likely meet similar IP68/IP69K standards for dust and water resistance, and both will be drop-tested. The Cat S62 Pro *may* have slightly more refined build tolerances, but the Doogee T40 offers comparable protection for most users.
❓ Does the Doogee T40 support fast charging, and how long does a full charge take?
The Doogee T40 supports 18W wired charging. While not 'fast' in the modern sense, it's standard for rugged phones. A full charge from 0-100% will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours, but the exceptional battery life means you won't need to charge it daily.
