Doogee T40 Pro vs Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing extended battery life and demanding performance in a rugged package, the Doogee T40 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Helio G99 chipset and impressive 59:53h endurance outweigh the Nokia XR20’s 5G and wireless charging capabilities for the average user seeking a workhorse device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee T40 Pro | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, aluminum alloy back | - |
| Dimensions | 278.8 x 174.3 x 7.6 mm (10.98 x 6.86 x 0.30 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 568 g (1.25 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 10800 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 59:53h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee T40 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (59:53h endurance)
- Powerful Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Long-lasting battery health (1300 cycles)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Established brand with software support
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, considering the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here shifts to durability; both are ruggedized, but the specific glass type (e.g., Gorilla Glass Victus) isn’t specified. The Nokia XR20’s brand reputation suggests a slightly more refined display experience, potentially with better color calibration, but this is speculative without further data.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, making a detailed comparison impossible. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The absence of sensor size or aperture information prevents a meaningful assessment. Image processing will likely differ, with Nokia traditionally favoring more natural colors and Doogee potentially leaning towards more vibrant, saturated images.
Performance
The Doogee T40 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) offers a significant architectural advantage over the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 (8nm). The smaller 6nm node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While the Snapdragon 480 boasts 5G connectivity, the Helio G99’s octa-core CPU (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is likely to deliver superior performance in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming compared to the Snapdragon 480’s (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460). This benefits users who frequently multitask or run demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Doogee T40 Pro’s battery endurance of 59:53h is a standout feature, significantly exceeding what’s typically expected from a smartphone. This is coupled with a claimed 1300 charge cycles, indicating long-term battery health. While the Nokia XR20 offers the convenience of 15W wireless charging, the Doogee’s superior endurance and faster 18W wired charging (vs Nokia’s 18W) make it the clear winner for users prioritizing minimal downtime. The Nokia’s wireless charging is a convenience feature, but doesn’t compensate for the substantial difference in overall battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee T40 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for outdoor work, travel, or simply dislike frequent charging. It’s ideal for users who prioritize performance in demanding apps and games. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer the convenience of 5G connectivity and wireless charging, and value a more established brand with a focus on software updates and a cleaner Android experience.