Doogee T40 Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and modern performance, the Doogee T40 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Helio G99 chipset and exceptional 59:53h endurance significantly outperform the Cat S62 Pro’s aging Snapdragon 660. However, the Cat S62 Pro benefits from brand recognition and a potentially more refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee T40 Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, aluminum alloy back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 278.8 x 174.3 x 7.6 mm (10.98 x 6.86 x 0.30 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 568 g (1.25 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~194 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.0 inches, 409.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | - |
| Type | 10800 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue | Black |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 59:53h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee T40 Pro
- Significantly longer battery life (59:53h endurance)
- More modern and efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less established brand reputation
- Slower 18W charging speed
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand with a history in rugged phones
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Proven durability and build quality
- Older and less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Likely slower performance
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for display excellence, focusing instead on durability. Specific display specs are unavailable for both, but given the rugged focus, expect IPS LCD panels. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, likely has lower peak brightness and color accuracy. The Doogee T40 Pro, while also likely IPS, benefits from a more recent manufacturing process, potentially offering slightly improved viewing angles and color reproduction. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both to protect the screen.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable for both devices. However, given the market segment, expect competent but not exceptional camera performance. The Cat S62 Pro likely features a more mature image processing pipeline, potentially offering more consistent results in challenging lighting conditions. The Doogee T40 Pro’s newer chipset *could* offer improved image signal processing capabilities, but this is speculative without further data. It's safe to assume both will include a standard wide and potentially an ultra-wide lens, but high-resolution sensors or advanced features are unlikely.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee T40 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) represents a significant leap over the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The 6nm process node of the G99 translates to superior power efficiency and thermal management, meaning sustained performance is higher and throttling is less likely. While both are octa-core CPUs with similar clock speeds (2.2 GHz peak), the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores are architecturally more advanced than the Kryo 260 Gold cores in the Snapdragon 660, resulting in better single-core performance. This impacts app launch times, multitasking, and overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Doogee T40 Pro dominates in battery endurance with a reported 59:53h of usage. While the Cat S62 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the older, less efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset will inevitably result in significantly shorter runtimes. The Doogee T40 Pro’s 18W charging is relatively slow by modern standards, but the exceptional battery life mitigates this. The Cat S62 Pro’s charging speed is also likely similar, or potentially even slower, given its age. The Doogee T40 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories in the field.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee T40 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for extended fieldwork, value a more responsive processor for everyday tasks, and are comfortable with a newer brand. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a well-established brand with a history of rugged phone development, potentially better software support, and are less concerned with having the absolute latest chipset.