The tablet market has a new wave of affordable options, and the Doogee T30E and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ represent compelling choices for budget-conscious consumers. While both aim to deliver a versatile tablet experience, they take distinctly different approaches to processing power and connectivity. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which tablet offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, delivers noticeably faster performance than the Doogee T30E’s Unisoc T606. While the T30E offers a lower price point, the A9+'s performance advantage justifies the price difference for all but the most basic tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April | 2023, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2023, October 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 258.1 x 169.7 x 8.8 mm (10.16 x 6.68 x 0.35 in) | 257.1 x 168.7 x 6.9 mm (10.12 x 6.64 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 537 g (1.18 lb) | 480 g or 492 g (1.06 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~137 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS - cellular model only |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 8000 mAh | Li-Po 7040 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray | Graphite, Silver, Navy |
| Models | - | SM-X210, SM-X215, SM-X216B |
| Price | About 120 EUR | $ 199.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.42 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Doogee T30E
- Lower price point makes it very accessible.
- Acceptable for basic tasks like reading and web browsing.
- Potentially longer battery life during *very* light use.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the A9+.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
- Slower charging speed (10W).
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset.
- 5G connectivity for on-the-go use.
- Faster 15W charging.
- Smoother multitasking and app loading.
- Higher price compared to the Doogee T30E.
- Battery life may be slightly shorter under heavy load (but more efficient overall).
Display Comparison
Neither Doogee nor Samsung provided display specs beyond size. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key difference lies in the processing power driving them. The A9+'s Snapdragon 695 will handle graphically intensive tasks more smoothly, resulting in a better visual experience, even if the panels themselves are similar. Expect both to be adequate for media consumption, but not color-accurate enough for professional photo or video editing.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet, given their target market. Both will likely feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots and video calls. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the A9+'s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 695 will likely result in slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Expect both to struggle with detailed photography.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) significantly outperforms the Doogee T30E’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The 6nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, are substantially faster than the T606’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. This difference will be most noticeable when multitasking, gaming, or running demanding applications. The A9+ also benefits from 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the T30E.
Battery Life
Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. While the exact battery capacities are unknown, the Snapdragon 695’s superior power efficiency gives the A9+ an advantage. The A9+ also supports 15W wired charging, compared to the T30E’s slower 10W charging. This means the A9+ will reach a full charge faster, minimizing downtime. The more efficient chipset will also contribute to longer runtimes between charges, especially during demanding tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee T30E if you prioritize absolute affordability and only need a tablet for extremely light tasks like reading ebooks or basic web browsing. Its lower price makes it a viable option for those on a very tight budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ if you value smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and 5G connectivity for on-the-go use. The A9+ is better suited for students, streaming enthusiasts, and anyone who wants a more responsive tablet experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Doogee T30E struggle with multiple apps open simultaneously?
Yes, the Unisoc T606 chipset in the Doogee T30E is not designed for heavy multitasking. Expect noticeable slowdowns and app reloading when switching between several applications. It's best suited for running one app at a time.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ worth the extra cost if I primarily use Wi-Fi?
If you consistently have access to reliable Wi-Fi, the 5G connectivity might not be essential. However, it provides valuable flexibility for situations where Wi-Fi is unavailable, such as during travel or in areas with poor coverage. It future-proofs the device as 5G networks expand.
❓ Can either tablet handle mobile gaming beyond casual titles?
The Doogee T30E will struggle with most modern mobile games, even at lower settings. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ can handle some games at medium settings, but don't expect a high-end gaming experience. Both tablets are better suited for less demanding games.
❓ What type of storage does each tablet use, and is it expandable?
Specific storage details are unavailable. However, given the price points, both likely utilize eMMC storage. Expandability via microSD card is common in this segment, but confirmation is needed for each model.
