The tablet market offers a wide spectrum of choices, from ultra-affordable options to premium powerhouses. We're pitting the Doogee T10E, a budget-focused tablet, against the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4, a flagship contender boasting cutting-edge hardware. This comparison will help you determine which tablet best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and a premium experience, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and vibrant display significantly outperform the Doogee T10E. However, the T10E remains a viable option for those on a strict budget needing basic tablet functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | - |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 04 | 2024, February 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August | Available. Released 2024, February 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 240.8 x 159.8 x 8.7 mm (9.48 x 6.29 x 0.34 in) | 278.7 x 191.6 x 6.3 mm (10.97 x 7.54 x 0.25 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 427 g (15.06 oz) | 590 g (1.30 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 2032 x 3048 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 457.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 360 nits | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| NFC | No | Yes (file transfer only) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 6580 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mint Green, Space Gray, Classic Black | Black, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | 24018RPACG |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Doogee T10E
- Significantly lower price point
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower power consumption (speculation)
- Weak processor performance
- Slow charging speed
- Likely lower quality display
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Fast 120W charging
- High-quality, bright display with excellent contrast
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potentially heavier than the Doogee T10E
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 boasts a significantly more advanced display. While the Doogee T10E’s specifications are unavailable, the Xiaomi’s measured 848 nits of peak brightness ensures excellent visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. The 1378:1 contrast ratio delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of detailed display specs for the T10E suggests a lower-quality panel, likely with lower brightness and contrast. This difference is crucial for users who consume a lot of video content or work with visually intensive applications.
Camera Comparison
Given the context data, a detailed camera comparison is limited. Both tablets likely feature basic camera setups geared towards video calls rather than photography. The absence of sensor size or aperture information for the Doogee T10E suggests a focus on cost reduction. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4, while not marketed as a photography powerhouse, likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) for improved image quality. Users prioritizing camera performance should look elsewhere, as tablets generally aren't the best choice for serious photography.
Performance
The performance gap between these tablets is substantial. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship chipset featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores, and efficient A510 cores. This architecture provides a massive leap in CPU and GPU performance compared to the Doogee T10E’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The T606, with its Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, is designed for entry-level devices and will struggle with demanding tasks. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also offers superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during prolonged use. The Xiaomi will handle graphically intensive games and multitasking with ease, while the Doogee will likely exhibit lag and slowdowns.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 excels in charging speed, offering 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 45% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 35 minutes. This is a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The Doogee T10E’s 10W charging is comparatively slow. While the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s active use score of 11:14h demonstrates excellent battery life, the Doogee T10E’s battery capacity and usage time are unknown. However, the more efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset in the Xiaomi likely contributes to its longer runtime despite potentially having a similar battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee T10E if you need a basic tablet for light tasks like web browsing, video calls, and casual media consumption, and your budget is under $200. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 if you demand flagship-level performance for gaming, demanding productivity apps, and enjoy a stunning display with fast charging – and are willing to pay a premium for it.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc T606 in the Doogee T10E sufficient for playing mobile games?
The Unisoc T606 is an entry-level chipset and will struggle with most modern mobile games, especially those with demanding graphics. Expect low frame rates and potential lag, even on lower settings. It's best suited for casual gaming or older titles.
❓ How does the 120W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 compare to standard tablet charging?
120W charging is exceptionally fast for a tablet. Most tablets charge at 20-30W. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 can reach 45% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 35 minutes, minimizing downtime and making it ideal for users on the go.
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a thermally efficient chipset, and the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 likely incorporates adequate cooling solutions. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the 4nm process node and optimized thermal design should minimize throttling and maintain consistent performance.
