Doogee S98 vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Doogee S98 emerges as the winner. Its Helio G96 chipset offers a noticeable speed advantage over the Snapdragon 660 in the Cat S62 Pro. However, the Cat S62 Pro’s established brand reputation for ruggedness and potentially more refined software experience shouldn't be dismissed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S98 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 18 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 28 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 320 g (11.29 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 15W wireless | - |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Red | Black |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Doogee S98
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Doogee is a less established brand in the rugged phone market
- Software updates may be less frequent
Cat S62 Pro
- Established brand reputation for ruggedness
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Strong build quality expected from Cat
- Older, less powerful processor
- Slower charging speeds
- May lack advanced camera features
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, we can infer that both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The Cat S62 Pro, being an older model, may have lower peak brightness and color accuracy. The Doogee S98, being newer, *could* feature a higher resolution or improved color calibration, but this is speculative. Users prioritizing outdoor visibility should investigate independent display tests for both models.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The Helio G96 in the Doogee S98 includes an ISP capable of handling higher resolution sensors and more complex image processing algorithms. While the Snapdragon 660 is capable, it's limited by its age. The S98 is more likely to support advanced features like 4K video recording and improved low-light performance. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a marketing feature rather than a substantial benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee S98’s Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm) utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores – compared to the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm) with its Kryo 260 cores. While the Snapdragon 660’s 2.2 GHz clock speed is higher on its performance cores, the G96’s architecture generally translates to better single-core and multi-core performance. The 12nm process node of the G96 is also more efficient than the 14nm node of the Snapdragon 660, potentially leading to better thermal management under sustained load. This means the S98 is likely to handle demanding applications and games more smoothly.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but the charging capabilities offer a clear distinction. The Doogee S98’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster than the Cat S62 Pro’s unspecified charging speed (likely around 18W). The addition of 15W wireless charging on the S98 provides further convenience. A larger battery capacity on the S62 Pro could offset the slower charging, but the S98’s faster charging will result in less downtime. Users who frequently need to top up their phone will greatly benefit from the S98’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S98 if you need a rugged phone with a more modern processor for demanding tasks like gaming or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if fast charging is a priority. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a brand with a long history in the rugged phone space, potentially benefiting from more mature software and a focus on enterprise-level durability, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.