Doogee S89 vs Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Doogee S89 emerges as the winner. Its Helio P90 chipset, despite being built on a larger node, offers a more modern CPU architecture. However, users deeply embedded in the Qualcomm ecosystem or requiring guaranteed long-term software support may find the Cat S62 Pro a more secure choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S89 | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 22 | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 28 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 172 x 86 x 19.4 mm (6.77 x 3.39 x 0.76 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 400 g (14.11 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~65.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.1 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GM9446 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Video | 1440p, 1080p | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 15W wireless | - |
| Type | 12000 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 530 EUR |
Doogee S89
- More powerful CPU architecture (Helio P90)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- 15W wireless charging support
- Potentially better ISP for image processing
- Larger 12nm process node may lead to slightly higher power consumption
- Less established brand reputation in rugged phones
Cat S62 Pro
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 – known for stability and optimization
- Potential for longer software support
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Possible thermal imaging capabilities (based on S62 series history)
- Older CPU architecture (Snapdragon 660)
- Slower charging speeds
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. While specific display specs are unavailable, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels common in the rugged segment. The Cat S62 Pro, given its brand positioning, may offer slightly better color calibration. However, the Doogee S89’s focus on newer technology suggests a potentially higher peak brightness, improving visibility in direct sunlight – a crucial factor for outdoor use. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, prioritizing durability over a sleek aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are lacking, but both phones likely prioritize practicality over photographic excellence. The Cat S62 Pro, historically, has focused on thermal imaging capabilities (not mentioned in the provided data, but a key feature of the S62 series), which the Doogee S89 lacks. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively assess image quality. However, the S89’s newer chipset may offer more advanced image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. We can assume both will feature a standard array of lenses, but neither is likely to compete with flagship smartphone cameras.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee S89’s Mediatek Helio P90 (12nm) features an octa-core configuration with 2x2.1 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture, while built on a larger process node than the Cat S62 Pro’s Snapdragon 660 (14nm), benefits from newer core designs. The Snapdragon 660 utilizes 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores. While the Snapdragon 660 is known for its efficiency, the P90’s Cortex-A75 cores provide a noticeable performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks. The 12nm process of the P90 may lead to slightly higher power consumption, but the architectural advantages should translate to a smoother user experience for demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Doogee S89’s 33W wired charging and 15W wireless charging provide a significant advantage over the Cat S62 Pro, which likely offers slower charging speeds. Faster charging is critical for users who rely on their phones throughout the day and need quick power top-ups. While a larger battery capacity on the S62 Pro could offset the slower charging, the S89’s charging capabilities offer greater convenience and reduce downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S89 if you need a rugged phone with a more contemporary processor for demanding tasks like video editing or running complex applications in the field. It’s ideal for users who frequently utilize wireless charging and appreciate faster power replenishment. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prefer a device with a proven track record of Qualcomm optimization, potentially longer software support, and a focus on reliable, consistent performance for core productivity tasks – even if it means sacrificing some raw speed.