Doogee S61 Pro vs Nokia XR20: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and smoother performance, the Nokia XR20 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 480 5G chipset, coupled with 18W wired and 15W wireless charging, offers a more modern and versatile experience than the Doogee S61 Pro's older Helio G35 and slower 10W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S61 Pro | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 81.4 x 14.6 mm (6.59 x 3.20 x 0.57 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 266 g (9.38 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~68.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 5180 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Transparent, Wood Grain, Carbon Fiber, AG Frost | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Doogee S61 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Rugged design for durability
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Outdated Helio G35 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- No 5G connectivity
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Snapdragon 480 offers better performance
- 18W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Higher price compared to the Doogee S61 Pro
- Rugged design may add bulk
- Software update commitment unclear beyond initial Android versions
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly high-end display. Details regarding panel type (IPS, AMOLED) and resolution are missing, but the focus here is on durability. The absence of high refresh rates is expected in this segment. The key difference lies in processing power impacting UI smoothness, not display quality itself. Both will likely offer adequate outdoor visibility, but detailed color accuracy analysis is impossible without further specs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information beyond the presence of cameras, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference is crucial. The Snapdragon 480 includes a more capable ISP (Image Signal Processor) than the Helio G35, resulting in better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature basic camera setups, the XR20 will produce superior photos and videos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone prioritizes advanced camera features.
Performance
The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Doogee S61 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The 8nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance. While both CPUs utilize an octa-core configuration, the Snapdragon 480’s Kryo 460 cores are more modern and efficient than the Cortex-A53 cores found in the Helio G35. This means the XR20 will handle multitasking, app loading, and general navigation with noticeably less lag. The XR20 also benefits from 5G connectivity, a feature entirely absent in the S61 Pro.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the Nokia XR20’s 18W wired and 15W wireless charging capabilities provide a substantial advantage over the Doogee S61 Pro’s limited 10W wired charging. Faster charging significantly reduces downtime, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The Snapdragon 480’s improved power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life, even with a similar capacity battery to the S61 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S61 Pro if you need a highly affordable, basic rugged phone for essential tasks like communication and light use, and aren't concerned with 5G connectivity or demanding applications. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize 5G connectivity, faster charging, a more responsive user experience, and longer software support, even if it comes at a slightly higher price point.