Doogee S51 vs. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: A Head-to-Head Rugged Phone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing affordability and basic functionality, the Doogee S51 offers a compelling entry point into the rugged phone market. However, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with its more powerful Exynos 9611 chipset and faster charging, is the superior choice for professionals needing sustained performance and quicker power-ups in the field.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S51 | Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 20, 29, 38, 40, 41, 66 - Canada | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September | 2020, January |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September | Available. Released 2020, January |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 81.4 x 14.6 mm (6.59 x 3.20 x 0.57 in) | 159.9 x 76.7 x 10 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~68.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~79.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G25 (12 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 25 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Quad-LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/k/v/r, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5180 mAh | Li-Po 4050 mAh, removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Orange | Black |
| Models | - | SM-G715FN/DS, SM-G715FN, SM-G715F, SM-G715W, SM-G715U, SM-G715U1 |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.47 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
Doogee S51
- Significantly more affordable
- Rugged design for basic protection
- Lightweight and portable
- Weak processor performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely limited software support
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
- More powerful Exynos 9611 processor
- Faster 15W charging
- Samsung’s software and security updates
- Higher price point
- LCD display lacks vibrancy
- Still not a flagship-level performer
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details regarding panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing for the Doogee S51, suggesting a basic LCD. The Samsung XCover Pro also utilizes an LCD, but its focus is on visibility under direct sunlight rather than color accuracy. Both prioritize durability over visual fidelity, with reinforced glass protecting the screens. The lack of high refresh rates on either device reflects their focus on battery conservation.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond sensor existence are sparse for the Doogee S51, but its likely a basic setup focused on functionality rather than quality. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, while not a photography powerhouse, offers a more capable camera system. Details regarding sensor size and aperture are needed for a full assessment, but the Exynos 9611’s image signal processor (ISP) provides better image processing capabilities than the Helio G25’s. The inclusion of features like optical image stabilization (OIS) – if present – on the XCover Pro would further enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The 2MP macro camera on both devices is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro’s Exynos 9611, fabricated on a 10nm process, significantly outperforms the Doogee S51’s Mediatek Helio G25 (12nm). The Exynos utilizes Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, offering a substantial performance boost over the S51’s Cortex-A53 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the Samsung. While both are octa-core, the architectural differences are key; the A73 cores are demonstrably more efficient and powerful. The 12nm process of the Helio G25 also suggests potentially higher power consumption for similar tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for the Doogee S51, but its 10W charging suggests a smaller battery to keep costs down. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features 15W wired charging, a modest improvement but significant for users needing to quickly top up their device during breaks. The Exynos 9611’s greater efficiency also contributes to better battery life under sustained load. While a larger mAh rating is always preferable, the combination of a more efficient chipset and faster charging gives the XCover Pro an edge in real-world usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S51 if you need a highly affordable, basic rugged phone for occasional outdoor use or as a secondary device. It’s ideal for those who prioritize cost over raw power. Buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro if you prefer a more refined experience with better performance for demanding tasks, faster charging, and the backing of Samsung’s software ecosystem – making it a better fit for professionals relying on their phone throughout a workday.