Doogee S51 vs Nokia XR20: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and a smoother overall experience, the Nokia XR20 is the better choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 chipset, coupled with 18W wired and 15W wireless charging, offers a noticeable performance and convenience advantage over the Doogee S51’s Mediatek Helio G25 and 10W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S51 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 81.4 x 14.6 mm (6.59 x 3.20 x 0.57 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~68.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Quad-LED flash | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 5180 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Orange | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | - | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Doogee S51
- Significantly lower price point
- Rugged design for durability
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Outdated Mediatek Helio G25 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 for smoother performance
- 18W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Higher price compared to the Doogee S51
- May still struggle with very demanding games
- Rugged design adds bulk
Display Comparison
Neither Doogee nor Nokia provide display specs beyond basic resolution. However, the XR20’s chipset suggests a more capable display controller, potentially leading to better color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of high refresh rates on either device is typical for this segment, focusing instead on visibility in direct sunlight. The XR20’s potential for a brighter panel, driven by the more powerful chipset, would be a significant advantage for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the XR20’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 480 chipset will likely deliver superior image processing, resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. While both phones likely feature a primary camera, the XR20’s chipset allows for more advanced features like computational photography and potentially better video stabilization. The S51’s camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots, but the XR20 will offer a more refined photographic experience.
Performance
The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) represents a significant leap in processing power and efficiency compared to the Doogee S51’s Mediatek Helio G25 (12nm). The 8nm process node allows for greater transistor density and lower power consumption, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance. While both CPUs utilize an octa-core configuration, the Snapdragon’s Kryo 460 cores are architecturally superior to the Cortex-A53 cores found in the Helio G25, resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. This difference will be most noticeable when multitasking, running demanding apps, or playing graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Nokia XR20’s 18W wired and 15W wireless charging capabilities provide a substantial advantage over the Doogee S51’s limited 10W wired charging. The faster charging speeds significantly reduce downtime, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The inclusion of wireless charging on the XR20 adds a layer of convenience, eliminating the need for cables. The Snapdragon 480’s improved power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life, even with similar capacity to the S51.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S51 if you need an extremely budget-friendly rugged phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and occasional light app use, and aren't concerned with 5G or fast charging. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize a more responsive user experience, 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, and the convenience of wireless charging, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.