Doogee S200X vs Ulefone Power Armor 19T: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and long-term battery health, the Doogee S200X is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Ulefone’s Helio G99, and the 1000-cycle battery promises extended longevity. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T excels in charging speed and wireless features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200X | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 16 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.63 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | 10100 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow, Green | Black |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee S200X
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 7050
- Exceptional battery endurance (98:33h)
- Long-term battery health with 1000 charge cycles
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Ultra-fast 66W wired charging
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Reverse wireless charging for accessories
- Less powerful Helio G99 chipset
- Potentially shorter battery lifespan compared to S200X
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can expect both to utilize IPS LCD panels. The Ulefone, being a newer model, *may* benefit from slightly improved color calibration or brightness. The absence of LTPO technology on either suggests standard refresh rates, likely 60Hz, impacting smoothness during scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature multi-camera setups focused on versatility rather than flagship-level image quality. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit, as image quality will be significantly lower than the main sensor.
Performance
The Doogee S200X’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) represents a clear advantage over the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7050 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the 19T’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the higher clock speed, translates to approximately 15-20% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. While both chipsets are built on a 6nm process, the Dimensity 7050’s more modern architecture offers better efficiency, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This benefits gamers and users running demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Doogee S200X boasts a 98:33h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s capacity isn’t specified, its 66W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving 52% charge in just 30 minutes. The S200X’s 33W charging is considerably slower. The 19T also offers 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the S200X. The S200X’s advertised 1000 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health, potentially mitigating degradation over several years of use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200X if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. Its superior processor and efficient chipset will provide a smoother experience. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prioritize quick top-ups and wireless charging convenience, especially if you frequently find yourself away from power outlets and value the flexibility of wireless power transfer.