Doogee S200X vs. Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained battery life and a slightly longer overall usage time, the Doogee S200X emerges as the winner. Its 98:33h endurance surpasses the Ulefone’s 88:30h. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra’s significantly faster 66W charging is a compelling advantage for those who need quick power-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200X | Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2023, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December | Available. Released 2023, November |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 16 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.63 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) 5 MP, f/2.2, (FLIR thermal camera, Lepton module) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | 10100 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow, Green | Black |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | 88:30h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class B | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Doogee S200X
- Longer battery endurance (98:33h)
- 1000 charge cycle rating for battery longevity
- Comparable processing power to the Ulefone
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities
- Missing detailed camera specifications
Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra
- Faster charging speed (66W, 52% in 30min)
- Wireless charging (15W) and reverse wireless charging (5W)
- Comparable processing power to the Doogee
- Shorter battery endurance (88:30h)
- Missing detailed camera specifications
- Potentially more heat generated during fast charging
Display Comparison
Both devices share the same Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset, meaning display differences won't impact performance. However, detailed display specs (resolution, panel type, peak brightness) are missing. Given the rugged nature of both phones, we can assume they prioritize durability over cutting-edge display technology. The absence of LTPO suggests neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to protect the screen.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, making a detailed comparison impossible. However, given the market segment, we can expect both phones to feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor likely around 50MP or higher. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a significant advantage, but is unconfirmed. Image processing will likely lean towards vibrant, saturated colors to appeal to a broader audience. The absence of details prevents assessing low-light performance or video recording capabilities.
Performance
Both the Doogee S200X and the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). This octa-core CPU, with its 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, delivers comparable processing power. The 6nm process node ensures reasonable thermal efficiency, but sustained workloads will likely lead to throttling. RAM specifications are not provided, but LPDDR5x is a likely candidate, offering a performance boost over older standards. The performance difference between these two will be negligible in day-to-day tasks and even most gaming scenarios.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra boasts a clear advantage in charging speed with its 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 52% charge in just 30 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Doogee S200X’s 33W wired charging. The Ulefone also adds 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging for added convenience. However, the Doogee S200X compensates with superior battery endurance, offering 98:33 hours compared to the Ulefone’s 88:30 hours. Both phones are rated for 1000 charge cycles, indicating comparable long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200X if you need maximum uptime between charges and value long-term battery health, as evidenced by its 1000 charge cycle rating. This phone is ideal for extended fieldwork, camping trips, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from power outlets. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra if you prioritize rapid recharging and appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, making it perfect for users who need to quickly top up their battery during short breaks or prefer cable-free solutions.