Doogee S200X vs Oukitel WP210: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Oukitel WP210 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset, built on a 4nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge, and the 45W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Doogee S200X offers excellent battery endurance and a competitive price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200X | Oukitel WP210 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2025, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December | Available. Released 2025, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 16 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.63 in) | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 45W wired |
| Type | 10100 mAh | Li-Po 8800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow, Green | Gray, Black, Red |
| Price | About 370 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class B | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Doogee S200X
- Exceptional battery endurance (98:33h)
- Competitive price point
- 1000 charge cycles for long-term reliability
- Dimensity 7050 chipset is less powerful than the 8200
- Slower 33W charging
Oukitel WP210
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset for superior performance
- Faster 45W wired charging
- More efficient 4nm manufacturing process
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (86:17h)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely utilize IPS LCD panels common in the rugged segment. The key differentiator will be peak brightness for outdoor visibility. Given Oukitel's focus on higher-end specs, it's reasonable to assume the WP210 may offer slightly better brightness and color accuracy. However, without specific data, this remains speculative.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role. The Dimensity 8200 in the Oukitel WP210 boasts a more advanced ISP, capable of handling higher resolution sensors and more complex image processing algorithms. This suggests the WP210 will likely deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume both phones will include a standard array of cameras, but the WP210 has the potential for better dynamic range and detail.
Performance
The Oukitel WP210’s Dimensity 8200 chipset, fabricated on a 4nm process, represents a significant architectural advantage over the Doogee S200X’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 8200’s CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a more aggressive core cluster for peak performance compared to the S200X’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 4nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Doogee S200X boasts a 98:33h endurance rating, while the Oukitel WP210 achieves 86:17h. This indicates the S200X offers superior battery life despite a slightly smaller capacity (implied). However, the WP210 compensates with significantly faster 45W wired charging, allowing for a quicker return to full power. The S200X’s 33W charging is adequate, but the WP210’s faster charging is a clear convenience advantage, especially for users who frequently deplete their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200X if you prioritize maximizing battery life and require a robust device for extended periods away from a power source, even if it means slightly slower processing speeds. Buy the Oukitel WP210 if you demand the best possible performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the convenience of faster 45W charging to quickly replenish the battery.