Doogee S200X vs Blackview BV8900: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Doogee S200X emerges as the superior choice. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Blackview BV8900’s Helio P90, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While both offer comparable battery endurance and charging, the S200X’s modern architecture offers a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200X | Blackview BV8900 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2023, May 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December | Available. Released 2023, June 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 16 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.63 in) | 172.4 x 82.2 x 19.8 mm (6.79 x 3.24 x 0.78 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 398 g (14.04 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.8 cm2 (~71.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", PDAF, OIS 5 MP, thermal assisted camera FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, LED flash |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | 10100 mAh | 10380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow, Green | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee S200X
- Significantly faster processor with the Dimensity 7050.
- More power-efficient chipset for longer battery life.
- Potentially longer battery lifespan with 1000 charge cycles.
- May be more expensive than the Blackview BV8900.
- Specific camera details are unknown.
Blackview BV8900
- Potentially lower price point.
- Rugged design suitable for harsh environments.
- 33W fast charging with reverse wired charging.
- Older and less powerful Helio P90 chipset.
- Less efficient chipset leading to potential throttling.
- Battery endurance data is unavailable.
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, but given the market segment, both devices likely feature LCD panels optimized for outdoor visibility. The key difference will likely be peak brightness and color accuracy. The S200X, being a newer device, may benefit from improved panel technology. However, without specific data, it's difficult to definitively state which offers a superior viewing experience. Expect both to prioritize durability over high-end display features.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but rugged phones often prioritize durability over camera quality. Expect both to feature a main sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro lens. The S200X, as a newer model, may incorporate improved image processing algorithms. However, without sensor size or aperture information, it’s impossible to determine which phone captures better photos. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a significant advantage, but is not specified for either device.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee S200X’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Blackview BV8900’s Helio P90 (12nm). The Dimensity 7050 utilizes newer Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the P90’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to approximately 20-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The 6nm process node also provides better power efficiency, meaning the S200X will generate less heat under load and potentially sustain peak performance for longer. Users who engage in gaming or resource-intensive tasks will see a noticeable improvement with the S200X.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 33W wired charging and reverse wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. The Doogee S200X boasts a 98:33h endurance rating, while the Blackview BV8900’s endurance is not provided. The S200X’s 1000 charge cycle rating suggests a longer lifespan for the battery. While the Blackview BV8900 may have a larger battery capacity, the Dimensity 7050’s superior power efficiency in the S200X could result in comparable real-world battery life. The 33W charging will likely deliver a full charge in approximately 90-120 minutes for both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200X if you prioritize performance for demanding apps, gaming, or future software updates. Its newer chipset and architecture will provide a smoother, more responsive experience. Buy the Blackview BV8900 if you are on a tighter budget and primarily need a durable phone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light app usage. The BV8900 offers a rugged build at a potentially lower price point, but sacrifices processing power.