Doogee S200 vs Blackview BV9900E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Doogee S200 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Blackview BV9900E’s Helio P90, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the BV9900E offers the convenience of wireless charging, the S200’s superior processing power and impressive 98-hour battery endurance make it the more well-rounded device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200 | Blackview BV9900E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2020, September 10. Released 2020, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 16 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.63 in) | 156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm (6.16 x 3.08 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 273 g (9.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.84 inches, 85.1 cm2 (~69.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V/CE Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 16 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 15W wired 18W wireless |
| Type | 10100 mAh | 4380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Silver | Black, Silver |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee S200
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7050)
- Longer battery life (98h endurance)
- Faster wired charging (33W) and reverse charging
- Potentially more advanced camera ISP
- No wireless charging
- Rugged design may be bulky
Blackview BV9900E
- Wireless charging support (18W)
- Established rugged design
- Potentially lower price point
- Good for basic smartphone tasks
- Older, less powerful processor (Helio P90)
- Shorter battery life
- Slower charging speeds
- Less capable ISP
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the S200's focus on modern internals, it's reasonable to expect a higher resolution and potentially a higher refresh rate panel than the BV9900E. The BV9900E's age suggests it likely utilizes an older LCD technology, while the S200 may benefit from advancements in color accuracy and viewing angles. Bezels are likely comparable given the rugged design constraints of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The Dimensity 7050 includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) capable of faster processing and improved image quality. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the S200’s ISP will likely deliver better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image clarity. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the BV9900E is a common, but often underwhelming, feature that adds little practical value.
Performance
The performance gap between the Doogee S200 and Blackview BV9900E is significant. The S200’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture – Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz versus the BV9900E’s Helio P90 (12nm) with Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7050 offers superior power efficiency and thermal management, meaning sustained performance will be higher on the S200. The Dimensity 7050 will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease, while the Helio P90 may struggle with more intensive workloads. The S200 is the clear winner for users prioritizing speed and responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Doogee S200 boasts an impressive 98-hour battery endurance, suggesting a larger battery capacity and optimized power management. While the Blackview BV9900E offers 18W wireless charging, the S200 compensates with faster 33W wired charging. The S200 also supports reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. The 1000 charge cycles rating for the S200 indicates a focus on long-term battery health, suggesting the battery will retain a higher capacity over its lifespan compared to the BV9900E.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200 if you prioritize performance for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its modern chipset and longer battery life are ideal for users who need a reliable and responsive device. Buy the Blackview BV9900E if wireless charging is a must-have feature and your usage is primarily focused on basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media. The BV9900E is a good option for those who value convenience over raw power.