Doogee S200 Ultra vs. Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Doogee S200 Ultra emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7400 chipset, built on a 4nm process, provides a performance edge and potentially better thermal management, while its slightly superior battery endurance of 98:33h offers longer runtimes between charges.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200 Ultra | Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2023, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2023, November |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 19.1 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.75 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 383 g (13.51 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) 5 MP, f/2.2, (FLIR thermal camera, Lepton module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8" | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.2µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 11000 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow, Green | Black |
| Price | € 479.99 / $ 399.28 / £ 419.99 | About 700 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | 88:30h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class B | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Doogee S200 Ultra
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 7400 (4nm)
- Longer battery endurance (98:33h)
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Lacks wireless charging
- No reverse wireless charging
Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- 5W reverse wireless charging for accessories
- Fast 66W wired charging (52% in 30 min)
- Slightly lower CPU performance with Dimensity 7050 (6nm)
- Shorter battery endurance (88:30h)
Display Comparison
While both devices are rugged, display details are absent in the provided data. However, considering the price point and target audience, we can infer both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here is on durability rather than display fidelity. Future testing would need to assess brightness, color accuracy, and outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the rugged nature of these phones, image processing will likely prioritize durability and clarity in challenging conditions. We anticipate both will feature capable main sensors, but without details on megapixel count, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS), it’s difficult to assess which offers superior image quality. The absence of information suggests neither phone is targeting the high-end smartphone photography market.
Performance
The Doogee S200 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the Ulefone’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The smaller node size generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration with the same Cortex-A78 (2x2.6 GHz) and Cortex-A55 (6x2.0 GHz) core arrangement, the Doogee’s CPU has 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the Ulefone’s 2x2.6 GHz, suggesting a potential boost in multi-threaded workloads. This difference, combined with the 4nm process, means the S200 Ultra is likely to sustain peak performance for longer periods without significant throttling.
Battery Life
The Doogee S200 Ultra boasts a 98:33h endurance rating, exceeding the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra’s 88:30h. Both offer 66W wired charging, but the Ulefone adds 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging. While the Ulefone’s wireless charging is a convenience, the Doogee’s longer battery life means fewer charging cycles are needed overall. The Ulefone claims 52% charge in 30 minutes, but without a comparable figure for the Doogee, it’s difficult to assess the real-world charging speed difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200 Ultra if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the efficiency of a 4nm chipset for sustained performance. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra if wireless charging is a must-have feature, and you appreciate the convenience of 15W wireless charging alongside the 66W wired option, even if it means a slight trade-off in CPU performance.