Doogee S200 Ultra vs Oukitel WP210: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and consistent performance, the Doogee S200 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its 98:33h endurance significantly outpaces the WP210, and while the Dimensity 7400 isn't as rawly powerful as the 8200, it provides ample performance for most tasks without sacrificing efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200 Ultra | Oukitel WP210 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2025, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2025, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 19.1 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.75 in) | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 383 g (13.51 oz) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 12GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8" | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 45W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 11000 mAh | Li-Po 8800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow, Green | Gray, Black, Red |
| Price | € 479.99 / $ 399.28 / £ 419.99 | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class B | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Doogee S200 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (98:33h endurance)
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Long-lasting battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- Slightly less powerful CPU than the WP210
- Display specs unknown, potentially average
Oukitel WP210
- More powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Potentially better image processing
- Faster CPU clock speeds for demanding tasks
- Shorter battery life (86:17h endurance)
- Slower 45W charging
Display Comparison
While display specs aren't provided, both phones likely utilize IPS LCD panels common in the rugged segment. The focus here is on durability, not pixel perfection. However, the chipset difference *could* impact display responsiveness; the WP210’s Dimensity 8200 has a more powerful GPU, potentially leading to smoother animations and faster refresh rates if implemented. The lack of LTPO technology on either device suggests a fixed refresh rate, impacting power consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role. The Dimensity 8200 in the WP210 generally offers more advanced image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of information on sensor sizes and OIS makes it impossible to assess image quality accurately, but the WP210’s superior processing power gives it a theoretical edge.
Performance
The Oukitel WP210 holds a clear advantage in raw processing power with its Dimensity 8200. Its CPU configuration (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) features higher clock speeds on the prime cores compared to the Doogee S200 Ultra’s Dimensity 7400 (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to faster app loading times and improved multitasking. However, the 4nm fabrication process shared by both chipsets mitigates some of the power consumption difference, and the Doogee’s optimized CPU configuration still delivers a smooth experience for everyday tasks. The WP210 will shine in demanding games and video editing.
Battery Life
The Doogee S200 Ultra’s 98:33h endurance is a standout feature, significantly exceeding the Oukitel WP210’s 86:17h. This difference is substantial and will be noticeable in real-world usage. While the WP210’s 45W charging is respectable, the S200 Ultra’s 66W charging offers a faster path to a full charge. The 1000 charge cycle rating on both devices is excellent, indicating long-term battery health. The S200 Ultra’s superior endurance makes it ideal for users who frequently find themselves away from power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200 Ultra if you need a phone that can reliably last through multi-day expeditions, prioritize battery health with its 1000 charge cycles, and value sustained performance over peak bursts. Buy the Oukitel WP210 if you are a power user demanding the fastest possible processing speeds for gaming or intensive applications, and are willing to trade some battery life for that extra performance headroom.