Doogee S200 Ultra vs. Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and raw performance, the Doogee S200 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7400 chipset, built on a 4nm process, and exceptional 98:33h battery endurance outweigh the Cat S75’s wireless charging convenience. However, users heavily invested in wireless ecosystems may find the Cat S75 a more appealing option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200 Ultra | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 19.1 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.75 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 383 g (13.51 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8" | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 11000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow, Green | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | € 479.99 / $ 399.28 / £ 419.99 | About 600 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee S200 Ultra
- Exceptional 98:33h battery life
- Faster 66W wired charging
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 7400 chipset
- Lacks wireless charging
- Display specifications unknown
Cat S75
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Established rugged phone brand (Cat)
- Potentially more compact design (speculation)
- Less powerful Dimensity 930 chipset
- Shorter battery life compared to S200 Ultra
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged nature of both phones, we can assume both utilize durable, scratch-resistant glass. The Cat S75, being a slightly older model, may have a lower peak brightness and potentially a lower refresh rate. The Doogee S200 Ultra's newer chipset *could* support higher resolution or refresh rate panels, but this is speculative without further data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market trend suggests the S200 Ultra, being a newer device, likely features a more advanced camera system. The focus should be on the main sensor resolution and aperture. Larger sensors and wider apertures capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is crucial for steady shots and videos, and is a feature to look for in both devices. We can assume both phones will include a suite of software enhancements for image processing, but the quality of these algorithms will vary.
Performance
The Doogee S200 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Cat S75’s Dimensity 930 (6nm). The 4nm process inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning the S200 Ultra is likely to sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. While the Cat S75’s CPU configuration includes 2x Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz, the S200 Ultra counters with 4x Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz, suggesting a substantial advantage in multi-threaded tasks and overall responsiveness. The GPU performance will also favor the S200 Ultra due to the newer chipset.
Battery Life
The Doogee S200 Ultra’s 98:33h endurance is a standout feature, dwarfing the expected battery life of the Cat S75. This translates to days of use on a single charge for typical users. The 66W wired charging on the S200 Ultra allows for significantly faster replenishment – a full charge will take considerably less time than the Cat S75’s 15W wireless charging. While wireless charging offers convenience, it’s inherently less efficient than wired charging. The S200 Ultra also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200 Ultra if you need maximum uptime for fieldwork, extended outdoor adventures, or simply dislike frequent charging. Its 98:33h battery endurance and faster 66W charging are ideal for power users. Buy the Cat S75 if you prioritize wireless charging convenience and are already invested in a wireless charging ecosystem, and don't mind slightly shorter battery life and a less efficient chipset.