Doogee S200 Ultra vs Blackview BV9200: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Doogee S200 Ultra emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 7400 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage, while its impressive 98:33h battery endurance ensures all-day usability. The BV9200’s wireless charging is a nice addition, but doesn’t offset the performance gap.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200 Ultra | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 19.1 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.75 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 383 g (13.51 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 10W reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 11000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow, Green | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | € 479.99 / $ 399.28 / £ 419.99 | About 200 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 98:33h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee S200 Ultra
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7400)
- Exceptional battery life (98:33h endurance)
- More efficient 4nm chipset for better thermal management
- Display specs not publicly available
- No wireless charging
Blackview BV9200
- Wireless charging support (30W)
- Measured display brightness and contrast ratio
- Potentially lower price point
- Older, less powerful chipset (Helio G96)
- Inferior CPU and GPU performance
- Likely shorter battery life
Display Comparison
The Blackview BV9200 provides measured display specs, boasting a 481 nit peak brightness and a 1423:1 contrast ratio. While respectable, these figures aren't directly comparable to the S200 Ultra, as Doogee doesn't publish these metrics. However, given the S200 Ultra’s focus on overall performance, it’s likely to have a display optimized for visual clarity during intensive tasks. The BV9200’s contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks, potentially enhancing media consumption, but the S200 Ultra’s panel is likely tuned for color accuracy and responsiveness.
Camera Comparison
Neither device’s camera specs are provided beyond the basic sensor information. However, given the S200 Ultra’s positioning as a premium rugged phone, it’s reasonable to expect a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and improved image processing. The BV9200 likely focuses on providing a functional camera for documentation and casual photography. Without detailed sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the S200 Ultra’s overall hardware advantage suggests a superior imaging experience.
Performance
This is where the Doogee S200 Ultra truly shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) is a generation ahead of the Blackview BV9200’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 7400’s architecture – Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) – offers significantly improved CPU and GPU performance compared to the BV9200’s Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The 4nm process node translates to better thermal efficiency, meaning the S200 Ultra is less likely to throttle under sustained load, crucial for gamers and power users. The BV9200 will handle daily tasks adequately, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Doogee S200 Ultra boasts an impressive 98:33h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the Blackview BV9200’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its 66W wired charging and 30W wireless charging offer flexibility. However, the S200 Ultra’s 66W wired charging is still competitive, and its significantly longer endurance means users will likely need to charge less frequently. The BV9200’s wireless charging is a convenience feature, but doesn’t compensate for the S200 Ultra’s superior stamina.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200 Ultra if you prioritize raw processing power for gaming, multitasking, or demanding applications, and require exceptional battery life for extended outdoor use. Buy the Blackview BV9200 if you value wireless charging convenience and are primarily focused on everyday tasks, accepting a trade-off in processing speed and overall system responsiveness.