Doogee S200 Max vs Ulefone Armor 17 Pro: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and longevity, the Doogee S200 Max emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset offers a significant performance advantage, coupled with exceptional battery endurance rated at 117:35h. While the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro provides wireless charging, the S200 Max’s superior processing power makes it the better choice for demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S200 Max | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.5 x 25.5 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 1.00 in) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 535 g (1.18 lb) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/2.8" | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | MagSafe compatible accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 18W reverse wired | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed |
| Type | 22000 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Gold | Black |
| Price | $ 350.76 / £ 474.99 / € 429.99 | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 117:35h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee S200 Max
- Superior processing power with Dimensity 7050
- Exceptional battery endurance (117:35h)
- Long battery lifespan (1300 cycles)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Camera specs unknown, potentially average
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Convenient wireless charging (15W)
- Fast wired charging (66W, 53% in 15 min)
- Balanced feature set
- Inferior processor (Helio G99)
- Shorter battery life compared to S200 Max
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points and target audience, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here will be on performance. The Armor 17 Pro's inclusion of wireless charging suggests a slightly more refined feature set, potentially indicating a more premium display coating for scratch resistance.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, the rugged phone market often prioritizes durability over camera quality. Both devices likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the image processing capabilities and sensor sizes will be key differentiators. We can assume both will offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will likely be a weak point for both.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee S200 Max boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm), featuring a 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. This is a substantial upgrade over the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s Helio G99 (6nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The A78 cores in the Dimensity 7050 offer significantly higher single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 6nm chips, the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 7050 provide a clear advantage for users who push their phones to the limit. The Armor 17 Pro will handle daily tasks adequately, but the S200 Max is the clear winner for gaming and resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Doogee S200 Max shines with a remarkable 117:35h endurance rating and a 1300 cycle lifespan, suggesting exceptional longevity. While the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro offers 66W wired charging (reaching 53% in 15 minutes) and the convenience of 15W wireless charging, the S200 Max’s 66W wired charging is still very competitive. The Armor 17 Pro’s wireless charging is a valuable addition for users who prefer cable-free charging, but the S200 Max’s superior battery endurance and cycle count provide a more significant long-term benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S200 Max if you need a rugged phone for intensive tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running demanding applications. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset and impressive battery life will keep you going. Buy the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro if you prioritize wireless charging convenience and a more balanced feature set, and your usage primarily revolves around everyday tasks and moderate gaming.