Doogee S119 vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime and cost-effectiveness, the Doogee S119 is the clear winner. Its astounding 59:53h battery endurance and 1300 charge cycles significantly outperform the Nokia XR20. However, if 5G connectivity and a more responsive user experience are paramount, the Nokia XR20 is the better choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S119 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 178.1 x 84.2 x 15.7 mm (7.01 x 3.31 x 0.62 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 368 g (12.98 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~72.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light 5 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.3, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 10200 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Silver | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 59:53h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee S119
- Exceptional battery life (59:53h endurance)
- High charge cycle count (1300 cycles)
- Faster wired charging (33W)
- Reverse wired charging
- Older, less efficient chipset (MT8788)
- No 5G connectivity
- Likely less responsive user experience
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More modern and efficient chipset (Snapdragon 480)
- Wireless charging support
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Slower wired charging (18W)
- Lower charge cycle count (unspecified)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details regarding panel type, resolution, and refresh rate are missing for both, suggesting a focus on practicality over visual fidelity. However, the absence of LTPO technology on either suggests neither will dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving. The display quality will likely be adequate for outdoor visibility, but not a standout feature.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Nokia XR20, being a more recent device, likely benefits from improved image processing algorithms within the Snapdragon 480’s ISP. The Doogee S119’s camera performance will likely be adequate for basic photography, but the XR20 is expected to deliver more detailed and dynamic images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes a definitive judgement impossible.
Performance
The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Doogee S119’s Mediatek MT8788 (12nm). The smaller 8nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations, the Snapdragon 480’s Kryo 460 cores are generally more efficient than the Cortex-A73/A53 combination in the MT8788. This means the XR20 will likely offer a smoother experience with demanding apps and multitasking, though the Doogee's larger core count might offer a slight edge in certain heavily threaded tasks. The XR20's 5G modem is a key differentiator, enabling access to faster mobile networks.
Battery Life
The Doogee S119 dominates in battery endurance with a reported 59:53 hours of use, coupled with an impressive 1300 charge cycles. This suggests a significantly larger battery capacity and optimized power management. The Nokia XR20, while offering the convenience of 15W wireless charging, is limited to 18W wired charging and a shorter overall battery life. The Doogee’s 33W wired charging is faster, allowing for quicker top-ups when needed. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Doogee is a useful feature for emergency charging of other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S119 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, work in remote locations without frequent access to power, or require a highly durable device at a lower price point. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a phone with 5G capabilities for faster data speeds, a more modern processor for smoother multitasking, and wireless charging convenience, even if it means sacrificing some battery life.