Doogee S118 Pro vs Blackview BV9300: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and extended battery life, the Doogee S118 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset delivers a noticeable performance advantage, coupled with exceptional 105:26h battery endurance. However, the Blackview BV9300 remains a strong contender for those seeking a more budget-friendly, efficient rugged phone.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S118 Pro | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.1 x 17.9 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 0.70 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 376 g (13.26 oz) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 10800 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Silver, Black/Red | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 390 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 105:26h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee S118 Pro
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Dimensity 7050
- Exceptional battery life (105:26h endurance)
- Faster reverse wired charging (33W)
- Potentially higher price point
- Larger size/weight due to larger battery (assumption)
Blackview BV9300
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Helio G99 chipset for everyday tasks
- Rugged build quality
- Lower CPU and GPU performance
- Slower reverse wired charging (5W)
- Shorter battery life (estimated)
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given their market positioning, we can infer both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here will be on performance. The chipset's ability to drive a higher refresh rate display (if present) will be a key differentiator, favoring the Doogee S118 Pro due to its superior GPU.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent. Given the rugged nature of both phones, image processing will likely focus on durability and clarity in challenging conditions. The chipset's ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role here, and the Dimensity 7050’s more advanced ISP in the Doogee S118 Pro should offer superior image quality, particularly in low-light scenarios and with dynamic range. Without sensor details, it's difficult to make definitive claims, but the chipset advantage leans towards the Doogee.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee S118 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz – compared to the Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99 (6nm) with Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a roughly 15-20% performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks for the Doogee. While both use a 6nm process, the A78 cores are more efficient and powerful. The Dimensity 7050 also benefits from a more capable GPU, making it the better choice for gaming and graphics-heavy applications. The Blackview BV9300’s Helio G99 prioritizes efficiency, potentially leading to slightly better sustained performance under lighter loads.
Battery Life
The Doogee S118 Pro boasts an impressive 105:26h endurance rating, suggesting significantly longer battery life than the Blackview BV9300 (no endurance data provided). While both support 33W wired charging, the Doogee’s superior battery capacity and more efficient chipset contribute to its longevity. The Doogee also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories in the field, while the Blackview is limited to 5W reverse wired charging, making it less practical.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S118 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and value the longest possible battery life. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prioritize a balance between affordability, decent performance for everyday tasks, and a reliable rugged build, and are less concerned with pushing the phone to its absolute limits.