Doogee S Cyber vs. Ulefone Power Armor 13: A Rugged Smartphone Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 is the better choice. Its Helio G95 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Doogee S Cyber’s Unisoc T606, and the inclusion of 33W wired and 15W wireless charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the S Cyber remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S Cyber | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.1 x 17.9 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 0.70 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 10800 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Silver | Black |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Doogee S Cyber
- More affordable price point
- Durable rugged design
- Reverse wired charging
- Less powerful Unisoc T606 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- More powerful MediaTek Helio G95 chipset
- Faster 33W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Higher peak display brightness
- Higher price compared to Doogee S Cyber
- Rugged design may be bulky
- Wireless charging can be slower than wired
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1306:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 boasts a measured peak brightness of 401 nits, which will provide better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Doogee S Cyber, whose brightness is not specified. While both are likely to utilize IPS LCD panels given the price points, the higher brightness of the Ulefone gives it an edge for outdoor usability. Bezels are likely comparable, given the rugged design focus prioritizing protection over minimal aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the market segment, we can expect similar image quality overall. The absence of detailed sensor information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, focusing on the chipset, the Helio G95 in the Ulefone Power Armor 13 benefits from a more capable image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) would be a significant advantage for the Ulefone, but this is unconfirmed. The likely presence of a 2MP macro lens on both devices offers limited practical value.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 13’s MediaTek Helio G95 chipset represents a significant performance advantage over the Doogee S Cyber’s Unisoc T606. The G95 features a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores versus the S Cyber’s 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores – resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The G95’s GPU also provides a better gaming experience. While both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the G95 translate to real-world performance gains. The S Cyber will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Power Armor 13 is better equipped for demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 296 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s charging capabilities are far superior. It supports 33W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and even 5W reverse wireless charging, allowing it to top up significantly faster than the Doogee S Cyber’s 18W wired charging. While the S Cyber does offer reverse wired charging, the slower charging speed of the Ulefone is a major advantage for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S Cyber if you need a highly affordable, durable phone for basic tasks like communication and light media consumption, and aren't concerned with demanding applications. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 13 if you prioritize performance for gaming or multitasking, require faster charging speeds (both wired and wireless), and are willing to spend a bit more for a more capable rugged device.