Doogee S Cyber vs Nokia XR20: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing 5G connectivity and wireless charging, the Nokia XR20 is the clear winner, despite its slightly higher price. However, the Doogee S Cyber offers a surprisingly competitive package, particularly for those on a tighter budget who can live without those features, making it a strong value proposition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S Cyber | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.1 x 17.9 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 0.70 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 10800 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Silver | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Doogee S Cyber
- Significantly more affordable price point.
- Rugged design provides excellent drop and water resistance.
- Reverse wired charging offers added utility.
- Less powerful Unisoc T606 chipset.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
- No wireless charging.
Nokia XR20
- Faster Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G processor.
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.
- Convenient 15W wireless charging.
- Higher price compared to the Doogee S Cyber.
- Potentially less aggressive pricing than competitors.
- Software update commitment needs verification beyond initial promises.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details regarding panel type (IPS vs AMOLED) and resolution are missing, but both likely target the 720p+ range typical for this segment. The focus here is on practicality and visibility in bright sunlight, rather than color accuracy. The absence of high refresh rates is expected. The key difference lies in the XR20's potential for slightly better viewing angles and color reproduction due to Qualcomm's typically superior display calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the XR20 likely features a more capable primary sensor. The Snapdragon 480 includes a dedicated image signal processor (ISP) that provides superior image processing capabilities compared to the Unisoc T606. This results in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the XR20, if present (spec not provided), would further enhance image clarity and stability. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, fabricated on an 8nm process, holds a significant architectural advantage over the Doogee S Cyber’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The Snapdragon 480’s Kryo 460 cores, clocked at 2.0 GHz, offer a noticeable performance boost over the T606’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. This translates to snappier app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, especially when running demanding applications. The 8nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones are adequate for everyday tasks, the XR20 is the better choice for users who frequently game or use resource-intensive apps.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 18W wired charging, but the Nokia XR20 adds the convenience of 15W wireless charging. While 18W isn't particularly fast, it's sufficient for overnight charging. The XR20’s wireless charging capability provides flexibility for users who prefer cable-free power-ups. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the rugged design and target user, both likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Snapdragon 480’s improved power efficiency could translate to slightly longer battery life on the XR20, despite potentially similar capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S Cyber if you need a highly affordable, durable phone for basic tasks and don't require 5G or wireless charging. It's ideal for construction workers, hikers on a budget, or anyone needing a reliable backup device. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, appreciate the convenience of wireless charging, and value Nokia's commitment to software updates and security.