Doogee S Cyber vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, coupled with a brighter display and faster charging, outweighs the Doogee S Cyber’s ruggedized build for most consumers. However, those needing extreme durability will find value in the Doogee.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee S Cyber | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.1 x 17.9 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 0.70 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 10800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Red, Silver | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | - | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
Doogee S Cyber
- Ruggedized design for enhanced durability
- Potentially lower price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Likely inferior display quality
- Slower charging speeds
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display (1870 nits)
- Fast 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Less ruggedized build
- Potentially higher price
- May require a case for added protection
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a substantial advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1870 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a scenario where the Doogee S Cyber’s display specifications are not available for comparison, but likely fall significantly short. While the Doogee likely prioritizes durability in its display construction, the Motorola’s brightness and potentially higher color accuracy (based on Motorola’s typical display calibration) offer a superior viewing experience. The lack of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Doogee S Cyber, a direct comparison is limited. However, given its price point, it’s reasonable to assume the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) will offer a more refined camera experience. The Motorola likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. While the Doogee may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting, the Motorola is expected to excel in low-light conditions and provide greater detail and dynamic range. We'll assume the Motorola will have OIS, a feature likely absent on the Doogee.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is considerable. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm), featuring four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz. This architecture is significantly more powerful than the Doogee S Cyber’s Unisoc T606 (12nm) with its two Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Doogee will be adequate for basic tasks, but the Motorola will handle multitasking, gaming, and resource-intensive applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving a 10:05 hour active use score. While the Doogee S Cyber’s battery capacity is unknown, the Motorola’s 68W wired charging capability significantly surpasses the Doogee’s 18W charging. This translates to dramatically faster recharge times – the Motorola can likely go from 0-100% in under an hour, while the Doogee will take considerably longer. The Motorola also adds 15W wireless charging, a convenience the Doogee lacks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee S Cyber if you require a genuinely rugged phone capable of withstanding harsh environments and prioritize affordability over raw performance. This is ideal for outdoor workers, adventurers, or anyone prone to dropping their phone. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you value a smoother user experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, significantly faster charging, and longer battery life for everyday tasks and entertainment.