Doogee Note59 Pro+ vs. Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Doogee's Unisoc T8200, and the 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the Doogee Note59 Pro+ excels in battery longevity, making it ideal for users who demand multi-day usage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Note59 Pro+ | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 8.6 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 6250 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 51:38h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Note59 Pro+
- Exceptional battery endurance (51:38h)
- Long battery lifespan (1100 cycles)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slow 18W charging
- Less powerful Unisoc T8200 chipset
- Limited camera information
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (45 min to 100%)
- Bright display (1148 nits)
- Shorter battery endurance (11:46h)
- Potentially more frequent charging required
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Doogee Note59 Pro+. This higher brightness translates to improved visibility in direct sunlight. While the Doogee’s display specs are missing, the Poco’s brightness advantage is substantial. We can assume the Doogee uses a standard LCD panel, while the Poco likely utilizes AMOLED technology, offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The absence of refresh rate information for the Doogee further highlights the Poco’s likely superior display experience.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera capabilities. However, the Poco X6 Pro’s inclusion of 'Photo / Video' suggests a more comprehensive camera system. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown, the Poco’s positioning within Xiaomi’s lineup indicates a focus on image quality. The Doogee’s camera specs are absent, suggesting a more basic implementation. It’s reasonable to assume the Poco X6 Pro offers superior image processing and potentially features like optical image stabilization (OIS), which are crucial for sharp, stable photos and videos.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Doogee Note59 Pro+'s Unisoc T8200 (6nm). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra features a more modern CPU configuration – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core alongside 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 cores – compared to the Doogee’s 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity chip also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. This translates to a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding tasks on the Poco X6 Pro.
Battery Life
The Doogee Note59 Pro+ claims an impressive 51:38h endurance score, coupled with a 1100 cycle battery lifespan, indicating exceptional longevity. However, its 18W wired charging is comparatively slow. The Poco X6 Pro, with its 67W wired charging (supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0), can reach 100% charge in just 45 minutes. While the Poco’s active use score is 11:46h, significantly less than the Doogee, the faster charging speed mitigates this difference for many users. The Doogee’s longevity is ideal for those who rarely have access to a charger, while the Poco offers convenience through rapid replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Note59 Pro+ if you absolutely need a phone that can reliably last over two days on a single charge and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, fast app loading, and quick charging, and are willing to charge your phone more frequently. The Poco X6 Pro is the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.