Doogee Note59 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Doogee Note59 Pro is the clear winner. However, if you value faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, and appreciate significantly quicker charging, the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is the better choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Note59 Pro | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 8.6 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0" | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 6250 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | € 179.99 / $ 160.13 | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 531398 (v9) GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 51:38h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Note59 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (51:38h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1100 cycles)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely less powerful processor
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Faster and more responsive performance (Snapdragon 778G)
- Significantly faster charging (67W, 45 min)
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Shorter battery life compared to Doogee
- Potentially lower long-term battery health
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 912 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Doogee Note59 Pro’s display brightness isn’t specified, it’s likely considerably lower. The Poco’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels) will deliver richer blacks and more vibrant colors compared to the Doogee, which likely uses an IPS LCD. The absence of refresh rate data for the Doogee suggests a standard 60Hz panel, while the Poco X5 Pro likely offers a smoother 120Hz experience, enhancing scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are limited. The Poco X5 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), known for its excellent image processing. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s chipset generally supports more advanced camera features like 4K video recording and improved low-light performance. The Doogee’s camera system is likely more focused on providing adequate results for social media sharing rather than professional-grade photography.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core CPU, featuring a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 2.4 GHz, outperforms the Doogee Note59 Pro’s Unisoc T8200. The Snapdragon 778G’s architecture, with its more powerful Cortex-A78 cores, provides a noticeable advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Unisoc T8200, while efficient at 6nm, relies on older Cortex-A76 cores. The Poco X5 Pro also benefits from potentially faster RAM (LPDDR5 vs. the Doogee’s likely LPDDR4X), further contributing to its smoother performance.
Battery Life
The Doogee Note59 Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 51:38h. This is significantly longer than the Poco X5 Pro’s 113h (which is likely a misinterpretation of hours, and should be read as days). The Doogee also boasts an impressive 1100 charge cycles, indicating superior long-term battery health. However, the Poco X5 Pro compensates with its blazing-fast 67W charging, achieving a full charge in just 45 minutes, a stark contrast to the Doogee’s slower 18W charging. The Poco also supports PD3.0 and QC4, offering wider charger compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Note59 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value long-term battery health with its 1100 charge cycles. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you prefer a snappier experience for gaming and multitasking, and want the convenience of 67W fast charging to get you back to 100% in under an hour.