The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Doogee Note 59 and Oppo A17k represent two compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Doogee focuses on sustained performance and exceptional battery life, while the Oppo A17k aims for a balance of affordability and basic functionality. This comparison will dissect their key specifications to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and longevity, the Doogee Note 59 is the clear winner. Its Unisoc T8200 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Oppo A17k’s Helio G35, coupled with an impressive 51:38h battery endurance. While the Oppo A17k is a viable option for very basic use, the Doogee provides a smoother, more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2022, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2022, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 8.6 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IPX4 water resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.92" | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
Reverse wired | - |
| Type | 6250 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Navy Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | CPH2471 |
| Price | - | About 130 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 51:38h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Note 59
- Superior processor performance with the Unisoc T8200
- Exceptional battery life (51:38h endurance)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slow 10W charging speed
- Limited display information available
Oppo A17k
- Extremely affordable price point
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks
- Compact and lightweight design (assumed)
- Inferior processor performance (Helio G35)
- Likely shorter battery life
- Limited features and capabilities
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. The focus here shifts to internal performance, as display quality is often a compromise in this segment. We can assume both will offer adequate viewing angles and color reproduction for everyday tasks, but won't compete with higher-end OLED displays.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information suggests neither device will excel in low-light conditions or offer advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The focus will likely be on providing acceptable image quality in well-lit environments. Any 2MP macro lenses included on either device should be considered a marketing feature rather than a significant photographic asset.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee Note 59’s Unisoc T8200, fabricated on a 6nm process, demonstrably outperforms the Oppo A17k’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The T8200’s octa-core configuration, featuring two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, provides a substantial boost in single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Helio G35’s four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. The 6nm process also translates to improved thermal efficiency, meaning the Doogee Note 59 is less likely to throttle under sustained load. This benefits users who engage in gaming or video editing.
Battery Life
The Doogee Note 59 boasts an impressive 51:38h endurance rating, a significant advantage over what we’d expect from the Oppo A17k. While the Oppo A17k’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the less efficient Helio G35 chipset suggests it will require more frequent charging. The Doogee also offers reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories. The 10W charging speed on the Doogee is slow by modern standards, but the exceptional battery life mitigates this drawback.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Note 59 if you need a phone capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and demanding applications without significant slowdown. Its superior processor and extended battery life make it ideal for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day. Buy the Oppo A17k if you prioritize extreme affordability and only require a phone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media browsing. It’s a suitable choice for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T8200 in the Doogee Note 59 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc T8200 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The processor’s Cortex-A76 cores provide a performance boost over the Helio G35, but it’s not a flagship-level chipset. Expect playable performance at medium settings.
❓ How does the 12nm process of the Helio G35 affect battery life in the Oppo A17k?
The 12nm process is less efficient than the 6nm process used in the Unisoc T8200. This means the Helio G35 consumes more power for the same level of performance, resulting in shorter battery life. Users of the Oppo A17k may find themselves needing to charge their device more frequently, especially with moderate to heavy usage.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the Doogee Note 59 useful for everyday use?
Yes, the reverse wired charging is a convenient feature. While the 10W charging speed isn't fast, it allows you to top up accessories like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch in a pinch. It's a practical addition for users who frequently use Bluetooth devices.
