The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Doogee Note 59 and Motorola Moto E13 both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Doogee prioritizes longevity and processing power, while the Moto E13 focuses on a streamlined experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and exceptional battery life, the Doogee Note 59 is the clear winner. Its Unisoc T8200 chipset and impressive 51:38h endurance significantly outperform the Moto E13, making it ideal for media consumption and moderate gaming. However, the Moto E13 remains a viable option for basic users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168 x 77.5 x 8.6 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.92" | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
Reverse wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 6250 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Price | - | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 51:38h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Note 59
- Superior performance with the Unisoc T8200 chipset
- Exceptional battery life (51:38h endurance)
- Reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely basic display quality
Motorola Moto E13
- Affordable price point
- Simple and streamlined user experience
- Familiar Motorola software
- Inferior performance with the Unisoc T606 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Limited features
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Details regarding panel type, resolution, or brightness are absent, suggesting both utilize basic LCD panels typical of this price bracket. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity. Bezels are likely substantial on both, and color accuracy will be standard for budget phones. The absence of high refresh rates is expected.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse, but it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. Without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Moto E13 is a common, but often underwhelming, feature in this segment. Image processing will likely be heavily reliant on software algorithms to compensate for the limitations of the hardware. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light. The Doogee's potential for better image processing is implied by its more powerful chipset.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee Note 59’s Unisoc T8200, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a significant advantage over the Motorola Moto E13’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The 6nm node translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the T8200 to sustain higher clock speeds for longer. The Doogee’s CPU configuration – 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 – is also more powerful than the Moto E13’s 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Doogee. While both are octa-core, the architectural improvements and process node give the Doogee a clear edge.
Battery Life
The Doogee Note 59 truly shines in battery endurance, boasting a remarkable 51:38h rating. While the Moto E13’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the less efficient Unisoc T606 chipset and larger process node suggest significantly shorter runtimes. Both phones offer 10W wired charging, which is slow by modern standards, but adequate for overnight charging. The Doogee also includes reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories like earbuds or smartwatches, absent on the Moto E13.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Note 59 if you need a phone that can handle multitasking, streaming video for extended periods, or light gaming without constantly reaching for a charger. It’s best for users who value performance and battery life above all else. Buy the Motorola Moto E13 if you prefer a simple, no-frills experience and primarily use your phone for calls, texts, and basic social media – prioritizing affordability and a familiar Motorola interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Doogee Note 59 struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Unisoc T8200 is a capable chipset, it's not designed for high-end gaming. You'll likely be able to play PUBG or Call of Duty at lower settings and frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense action. The Moto E13 would struggle even more with these titles.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Doogee Note 59 with the 10W charger?
With a 10W charger, expect a full charge to take approximately 3-4 hours. While slow, this is typical for phones in this price range. The long battery life mitigates the slow charging speed, as you won't need to charge it as frequently.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the Doogee Note 59 useful for more than just earbuds?
Yes, while primarily useful for accessories like earbuds or smartwatches, the reverse wired charging can also provide a small emergency charge to another smartphone, though it will be a very slow process. It's a convenient feature to have in a pinch.
