The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Doogee N55 enters the arena promising exceptional battery life, while the Samsung Galaxy A04s leverages Samsung’s brand recognition and a brighter display. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device delivers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing longevity, the Doogee N55 is the clear winner, offering a staggering 42:53h endurance and 1100 charge cycles. However, the Samsung Galaxy A04s provides a more visually appealing experience with its 389 nits brightness and faster 15W charging, making it suitable for media consumption.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 350 nits | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Natural | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | - | SM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M |
| Price | About 120 EUR | € 133.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1614:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 145123(v9)
GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 42:53h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee N55
- Exceptional battery life (42:53h endurance)
- High charge cycle count (1100 cycles)
- Potentially strong single-core performance with A75 cores
- Slower charging speed (10W)
- Display specs are unknown, likely basic
Samsung Galaxy A04s
- Brighter display (389 nits)
- Faster charging (15W)
- Samsung brand recognition and software support
- Significantly shorter battery life (114h endurance)
- Less efficient Exynos 850 chipset
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A04s boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 389 nits, compared to the Doogee N55’s unlisted brightness. While the N55’s display specs are missing, the A04s’ 1614:1 contrast ratio ensures a punchy image. The A04s’ brightness is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point in this price bracket. The lack of detailed display information for the Doogee N55 suggests a more basic panel, likely prioritizing power efficiency over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given the price point, image quality will likely be similar. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible. It’s safe to assume both phones rely on software processing to enhance images, and the 2MP macro cameras found on many phones in this segment are unlikely to deliver significant detail. Focusing on the main sensor performance will be key for both devices.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04s utilizes the Exynos 850 (8nm), featuring four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, while the Doogee N55 employs the Unisoc T606 (12nm) with a mix of Cortex-A75 (1.6 GHz) and A55 (1.6 GHz) cores. Despite the Exynos 850’s higher clock speed, the Unisoc T606’s architecture, including the more powerful A75 cores, may offer comparable real-world performance in everyday tasks. The 8nm process of the Exynos 850 should provide better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. However, the A75 cores in the Doogee N55 could provide a boost in single-core performance.
Battery Life
The Doogee N55 dominates in battery endurance with a remarkable 42:53h rating and a claimed 1100 charge cycles. This is a substantial improvement over the Samsung Galaxy A04s’ 114h endurance. While the A04s offers 15W wired charging, compared to the N55’s 10W, the N55’s massive battery capacity mitigates the slower charging speed. The 1100 charge cycle claim for the Doogee N55 is particularly noteworthy, suggesting long-term battery health will be superior.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee N55 if you need a phone that can reliably last through multiple days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from power outlets. Its focus is on sheer endurance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A04s if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display for watching videos or browsing, and prefer the convenience of slightly faster charging, even if it means sacrificing some battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc T606 in the Doogee N55 struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
While the Unisoc T606 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it should handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The A75 cores provide a performance boost, but expect some frame drops during intense action. The Exynos 850 in the A04s might offer slightly smoother performance, but both phones are best suited for casual gaming.
❓ Is the 1100 charge cycle claim for the Doogee N55 realistic, and what does it mean for long-term battery health?
1100 charge cycles is a significant claim, suggesting the battery is designed to retain a substantial portion of its capacity even after extensive use. A typical smartphone battery degrades after around 500 full charge cycles. If accurate, the Doogee N55’s battery should remain usable for a longer period before requiring replacement.
❓ How much of a difference will the 15W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A04s make compared to the Doogee N55's 10W charging?
While 15W is faster than 10W, the difference won't be dramatic. Expect the A04s to charge slightly quicker, potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes for a full charge. However, the Doogee N55’s much larger battery capacity means it will take longer to fill regardless of the charging speed.
