Doogee N50 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and supports 5G connectivity. Crucially, the 67W SuperVOOC charging dramatically reduces downtime, a significant benefit over the Doogee N50’s 18W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee N50 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 25 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 390 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fairy pink, Electric blue, Granite black | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | - | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Doogee N50
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer a more rugged build (Doogee's brand focus)
- Acceptable for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly slower performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Less efficient Unisoc chipset
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W SuperVOOC charging
- More efficient 6nm process
- Likely a slightly higher price
- LCD display (not OLED)
- Software updates may be less frequent than flagship OnePlus models
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing for the Doogee N50, its price point suggests an LCD panel. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite also utilizes an LCD. The key differentiator here isn't display quality, but the underlying processing power impacting UI smoothness. The Snapdragon 695’s superior GPU will contribute to a more fluid experience when scrolling and navigating the interface, even if both displays share similar characteristics.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Doogee N50, a direct comparison is limited. However, budget phones often prioritize megapixel count over sensor size and image processing. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which offers improved noise reduction and dynamic range. While both phones likely include a standard array of lenses, the Snapdragon’s ISP will likely deliver more consistent and pleasing results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume both will have a primary sensor, and likely a depth or macro sensor of limited utility.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant difference. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Doogee N50’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, meaning sustained performance is higher on the OnePlus. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a clear advantage over the Unisoc’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Doogee N50’s 18W charging is a significant disadvantage compared to the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W SuperVOOC charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the charging speed difference is dramatic. The OnePlus can reach 80% charge in just 30 minutes, while the Doogee will take considerably longer. This faster charging is a game-changer for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day. The more efficient Snapdragon 695 will also contribute to better overall battery life on the OnePlus.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee N50 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. You'll need to be patient with charging times and accept a less responsive experience. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you value faster performance, 5G connectivity, and significantly quicker charging. It’s ideal for users who enjoy occasional gaming, streaming, and want a more future-proof device.