The Doogee Fire 5 and Blackview A70 Pro represent a growing segment of ultra-affordable smartphones. Both aim to deliver essential functionality without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Fire 5 emphasizes longevity with a massive battery, while the A70 Pro attempts to optimize performance with a newer chipset. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Doogee Fire 5 is the clear winner, thanks to its impressive 64:40h endurance. However, the Blackview A70 Pro’s more modern Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset offers a potentially smoother experience for everyday tasks, making it a better choice for those who value responsiveness over sheer runtime.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September | Available. Released 2021, December |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 176.5 x 82.5 x 18.7 mm (6.95 x 3.25 x 0.74 in) | 165.2 x 77 x 9.6 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 389 g (13.72 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~71.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 15 (Go edition) | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
other unspecified cameras |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 13000 mAh | 5380 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Orange, Green | Black, Blue, Red, Green |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 64:40h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class F | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Fire 5
- Exceptional battery life (64:40h endurance)
- 1100 battery charge cycles suggest long-term reliability
- Potentially better multi-tasking due to octa-core CPU
- Older, less efficient 28nm chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely basic display quality
Blackview A70 Pro
- More modern and efficient Unisoc Tiger T310 chipset
- Potentially smoother performance for everyday tasks
- 12nm process offers improved power efficiency
- Battery life likely shorter than Doogee Fire 5
- 2MP macro camera offers limited value
- Likely basic display quality
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Details regarding panel type, resolution, or brightness are absent, suggesting both utilize basic LCD panels common in this price bracket. The focus here is purely on functionality, not visual fidelity. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, and color accuracy should be considered average at best. The lack of information prevents a meaningful comparison beyond acknowledging they both serve the basic purpose of displaying information.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, leaning towards basic functionality. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s safe to assume both rely on entry-level sensors. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A70 Pro is a common marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization. Image processing will likely be basic, prioritizing speed over detail. Users should expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview A70 Pro’s Unisoc Tiger T310, fabricated on a 12nm process, represents a generational leap over the Doogee Fire 5’s 28nm Unisoc SC9863A. While the Fire 5 utilizes an octa-core configuration (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55), the A70 Pro employs a quad-core setup with a more powerful Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2.0 GHz alongside three Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. This architectural difference means the A70 Pro should exhibit better single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The 12nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency, though the Fire 5’s larger battery mitigates this advantage. The Fire 5's higher core count *could* benefit multi-tasking, but the older architecture likely limits its overall impact.
Battery Life
The Doogee Fire 5’s 64:40h endurance is its standout feature. This translates to exceptional battery life, easily lasting a full day of heavy use and potentially stretching to two days with moderate usage. The 10W charging is slow by modern standards, requiring several hours for a full charge. The Blackview A70 Pro, while lacking specific endurance figures, benefits from the more efficient Tiger T310 chipset. However, it’s unlikely to match the Fire 5’s longevity. Charging speed is also likely to be similar, around 10W, meaning comparable 0-100% charge times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Fire 5 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from a charger. It’s ideal for travelers, field workers, or anyone who simply dislikes the anxiety of low battery warnings. Buy the Blackview A70 Pro if you prefer a slightly more responsive user experience for common tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, and are willing to compromise on ultimate battery endurance. It’s a good fit for students or casual smartphone users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How will the older chipset in the Doogee Fire 5 affect app loading times compared to the Blackview A70 Pro?
The Blackview A70 Pro’s Unisoc Tiger T310, with its Cortex-A75 core, will likely result in noticeably faster app loading times and a more responsive user interface. The Doogee Fire 5’s SC9863A, while having more cores, is based on an older architecture and will struggle to match the A70 Pro’s single-core performance.
❓ Is the 10W charging on either phone a significant drawback in 2024?
Yes, 10W charging is slow by today’s standards. Expect a full charge to take several hours (likely 3-5 hours). This isn’t a dealbreaker for users who charge overnight, but it’s inconvenient for those needing a quick top-up. The Doogee Fire 5’s exceptional battery life somewhat mitigates this issue, as you’ll need to charge it less frequently.
❓ Will the Doogee Fire 5’s battery hold its charge well over time, given its 1100 charge cycles?
The 1100 charge cycle rating suggests the Doogee Fire 5’s battery is designed for long-term durability. This means it should maintain a significant portion of its original capacity even after hundreds of charge cycles, offering a longer usable lifespan compared to phones with lower-rated batteries.
