Doogee Fire 3 Ultra vs BLU G63: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value

The Doogee Fire 3 Ultra and BLU G63 represent opposite ends of the budget smartphone spectrum. The Doogee prioritizes extreme battery life and ruggedness, while the BLU G63 aims for affordability. Both utilize the same Unisoc T7200 chipset, making a direct performance comparison intriguing, but the differences in battery capacity and overall design philosophy create a clear distinction for potential buyers.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing longevity and resilience, the Doogee Fire 3 Ultra is the clear winner. Its exceptional 91-hour battery endurance and 1100 charge cycles significantly outperform the BLU G63, despite both phones sharing the same processor. However, the BLU G63 offers a compelling value proposition for those on a tighter budget.

PHONES
Phone Names Doogee Fire 3 Ultra BLU G63
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 662, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28, 66, 71
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2025, August2023, June
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, AugustAvailable. Released 2023, July
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, glass back
Dimensions162.5 x 77.4 x 17.8 mm (6.40 x 3.05 x 0.70 in)173 x 78 x 9.2 mm (6.81 x 3.07 x 0.36 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight290 g (10.23 oz)230 g (8.11 oz)
Display
ProtectionMohs level 5-
Resolution720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~258 ppi density)
Size5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~62.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetUnisoc T7200 (12 nm)-
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57 MP1
OSAndroid 15Android 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC
Internal256GB 6GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), infrared night vision light13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)8 MP, f/2.0
Video720p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer
Battery
Charging18W wired-
Type8350 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, Orange, GreenPearl, Black, Green, Purple
PriceAbout 160 EURAbout 120 EUR
EU LABEL
Battery91:00h endurance, 1100 cycles-
EnergyClass A-
Free fallClass D (45 falls)-
RepairabilityClass C-

Doogee Fire 3 Ultra

  • Exceptional 91-hour battery endurance
  • High battery cycle count (1100)
  • Potentially ruggedized design (implied by 'Fire' branding)

  • Limited display specifications
  • Camera details are unknown

BLU G63

  • Affordable price point
  • Same Unisoc T7200 chipset as the Doogee
  • Likely lighter and more compact design

  • Inferior battery life (estimated)
  • Limited display specifications
  • Camera details are unknown

Display Comparison

Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their price points, it's reasonable to assume both utilize LCD panels. The absence of information regarding refresh rates, resolution, or brightness suggests neither phone will excel in display quality. Users seeking vibrant colors or high refresh rates should consider alternatives. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are absent beyond the chipset information. Given the market segment, both phones likely feature basic camera setups focused on functionality rather than image quality. Expect modest performance in low-light conditions and limited dynamic range. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, as such low-resolution sensors rarely produce usable images. Without sensor size or aperture data, a meaningful comparison is impossible.

Performance

Both the Doogee Fire 3 Ultra and BLU G63 are powered by the Unisoc T7200 (12nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core configuration with 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates comparable CPU performance for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The 12nm process node suggests moderate thermal efficiency; sustained heavy workloads may lead to some throttling. The lack of RAM specifications prevents a definitive assessment of multitasking capabilities, but both will likely perform similarly given the shared chipset.

Battery Life

The Doogee Fire 3 Ultra’s 91-hour endurance is its standout feature, dwarfing any potential battery life the BLU G63 might offer (no battery data provided). The 1100 charge cycles also suggest superior long-term battery health. The Doogee’s 18W wired charging is standard for this price range, but the massive battery capacity will require a significant amount of time to fully charge. The BLU G63’s charging speed is unknown, but a slower rate is probable, and without knowing the battery capacity, it's difficult to estimate 0-100% charge times.

Buying Guide

Buy the Doogee Fire 3 Ultra if you need a phone that can withstand harsh conditions and last for days on a single charge – ideal for outdoor workers, travelers, or anyone who frequently finds themselves away from a power outlet. Buy the BLU G63 if you prefer a more conventional, budget-friendly smartphone experience and prioritize initial cost over extended battery life and rugged features.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Given both phones use the Unisoc T7200, will I notice a performance difference in demanding games?
While the CPUs are identical, potential differences in RAM speed and thermal management could lead to slight performance variations in demanding games. However, neither phone is designed for high-end gaming; expect to play most titles on medium settings or lower. The Doogee's larger battery might allow for slightly longer gaming sessions before throttling becomes a significant issue.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Doogee Fire 3 Ultra with its 18W charger, considering its large battery?
Due to the substantial battery capacity (implied by the 91-hour endurance), a full charge will likely take several hours – potentially 3-5 hours or more. While 18W charging is standard, it will be a slow process given the battery size. The BLU G63, with an unknown battery capacity, may charge faster, but likely still won't reach a quick-charge level.
❓ Is the Doogee Fire 3 Ultra truly ruggedized, and what level of protection does it offer?
The 'Fire' branding suggests a degree of ruggedization, but specific IP ratings (e.g., IP68 for water and dust resistance) are not provided. It's reasonable to expect some level of drop and shock resistance, but users should not assume it's fully waterproof or capable of withstanding extreme conditions without further information.