Doogee DK10 vs Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Doogee DK10 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8020 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage, complemented by blazing-fast 120W charging. However, the Ulefone Armor 9E remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and a proven rugged design.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee DK10 | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 28 | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 181.7 x 83.1 x 12.7 mm (7.15 x 3.27 x 0.5 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~71.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.31", PDAF 16 MP, f/2.5, (telephoto), 1/3.1", PDAF, 4x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.76" | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 50W wireless Reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Emerald Green, Kevlar Black | Black |
| Price | - | About 290 EUR |
Doogee DK10
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- Blazing-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Reverse wired charging for powering other devices
- Potentially higher price point
- May generate more heat under sustained load
Ulefone Armor 9E
- More affordable price
- Proven rugged design and durability
- Simpler, potentially more reliable software experience
- Outdated processor limits performance
- Slow 18W charging
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the DK10's focus on performance, it's reasonable to expect a higher refresh rate panel than the Armor 9E. The Armor 9E, being an older model, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz LCD. The DK10's more modern chipset could support a higher resolution and potentially LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, improving battery efficiency. Bezels are likely similar, given both phones' rugged design constraints.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not provided for either device. However, given the DK10’s positioning as a higher-end device, it’s likely to feature a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and improved image processing capabilities. The Armor 9E, being an older and more budget-oriented model, likely features a simpler camera setup. Without specific details, it’s difficult to assess image quality, but the DK10’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 8020 chipset will likely result in better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The performance gap between the Doogee DK10 and Ulefone Armor 9E is significant. The DK10’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm) boasts a modern CPU architecture – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz – offering substantially higher single-core and multi-core performance than the Armor 9E’s Helio P90 (12nm). The Helio P90’s CPU, with two Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, is a generation behind and fabricated on a larger, less efficient node. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the DK10. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 8020 also implies better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but the charging capabilities highlight a major difference. The Doogee DK10’s 120W wired charging and 50W wireless charging are dramatically faster than the Ulefone Armor 9E’s 18W wired charging. This means the DK10 can go from 0-100% in a fraction of the time. While the Armor 9E might have a slightly larger battery capacity, the DK10’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The DK10 also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Armor 9E, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee DK10 if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if fast charging is a priority. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prefer a more affordable rugged phone for basic communication, navigation, and light usage, and are willing to compromise on processing power and charging speed.