The smartwatch market is flooded with options, but finding a balance between features and affordability can be challenging. We pit the Doogee D11, powered by the Realtek 8763EW chipset, against the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE, boasting the convenience of wireless charging, to determine which offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing core fitness tracking and basic smartwatch functionality, the Doogee D11 offers a compelling value proposition. However, the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE’s wireless charging capability and potentially more refined software experience make it the better choice for those seeking convenience and a slightly more premium feel.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Speed | - | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 25 | 2022, November 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 25 | Available. Released 2022, November 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 46 x 46 x 10.7 mm (1.81 x 1.81 x 0.42 in) | 46.4 x 46.4 x 11 mm (1.83 x 1.83 x 0.43 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 38 g (1.34 oz) | 35.6 g (1.27 oz) |
| | - | 50m water resistant
5 ATM
Compatible with standard 22mm straps (46mm model) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 360 x 360 pixels (~386 ppi density) | 466 x 466 pixels (~326 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.32 inches | 1.43 inches |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| Chipset | Realtek 8763EW | - |
| OS | Proprietary | HarmonyOS 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | - | 4GB |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, SpO2 |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 300 mAh | 455 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver, Yellow | Graphite Black, Wilderness Green |
| Models | - | RUNE-B29 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Doogee D11
- Potentially longer battery life due to the Realtek 8763EW's power efficiency.
- More affordable price point.
- Focus on core fitness tracking features.
- Lacks wireless charging convenience.
- Realtek 8763EW chipset offers limited performance.
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially impacting visibility.
Huawei Watch GT 3 SE
- Convenient wireless charging.
- Potentially smoother software experience due to Huawei’s optimization.
- Access to Huawei’s health ecosystem.
- Likely more expensive than the Doogee D11.
- Battery life may be shorter than the Doogee D11.
- Chipset details are unavailable, making performance prediction difficult.
Display Comparison
Information regarding display specifications (resolution, panel type, brightness) is unavailable for both devices. However, given their price points, it's reasonable to expect both utilize LCD panels. The lack of details suggests neither device will excel in outdoor visibility or color accuracy. The focus here is on functionality over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Neither device features a camera, focusing instead on core smartwatch and fitness tracking capabilities. This is a common omission in budget-friendly smartwatches, prioritizing battery life and reducing complexity.
Performance
The Doogee D11’s Realtek 8763EW chipset is a low-power processor commonly found in entry-level wearables. While sufficient for basic tasks like step tracking, heart rate monitoring, and notification display, it will likely struggle with complex operations or demanding applications. The Huawei Watch GT 3 SE’s chipset details are not provided, but Huawei typically optimizes its software to run efficiently on its hardware, potentially offering a smoother experience despite potentially similar underlying processing power. The Realtek chipset’s architecture prioritizes power efficiency, extending battery life at the cost of raw performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are unavailable for both devices. However, the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE’s wireless charging capability offers a significant convenience factor. While wireless charging is typically slower than wired charging, it eliminates the need for cables and provides a more seamless charging experience. The Realtek 8763EW in the Doogee D11 is known for its low power consumption, potentially resulting in longer battery life despite a potentially smaller battery capacity. The trade-off is convenience versus potential longevity between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee D11 if you need a functional, affordable smartwatch primarily for fitness tracking and notifications, and aren't concerned with wireless charging. Buy the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE if you prefer the convenience of wireless charging, potentially benefit from Huawei’s established health ecosystem, and are willing to spend a bit more for a potentially smoother user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Doogee D11 support smartphone notifications, and if so, what types?
Given the Realtek 8763EW chipset's capabilities, the Doogee D11 likely supports basic smartphone notifications for calls, texts, and app alerts. However, the level of customization and interactivity may be limited compared to higher-end smartwatches.
❓ Is the wireless charging on the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE compatible with any Qi-certified wireless charger?
While Huawei doesn't explicitly state Qi compatibility, the Watch GT series has historically been compatible with standard Qi wireless chargers. However, for optimal charging speeds and performance, using a Huawei-branded wireless charger is recommended.
❓ How accurate is the heart rate monitoring on the Doogee D11 compared to dedicated chest straps?
Wrist-based heart rate monitoring, like that found on the Doogee D11, is generally less accurate than a dedicated chest strap, especially during high-intensity exercise. Expect some degree of error, but it should be sufficient for general fitness tracking and monitoring trends.