The sub-$250 5G smartphone market is heating up. The Doogee Blade20 prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G focuses on faster charging and a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects these trade-offs to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained usage, the Doogee Blade20’s remarkable 85-hour battery life and 1100 charge cycles are compelling. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G wins for those who value quicker top-ups and a more responsive overall experience thanks to the Snapdragon 750G.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 174 x 81.2 x 15.8 mm (6.85 x 3.20 x 0.62 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 327 g (11.53 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7200 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.8", AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0" | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | 10300 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Natural | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | - | M2007J17C |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 370 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 85:12h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Blade20
- Exceptional battery life (85 hours)
- Long battery lifespan (1100 cycles)
- Potentially more affordable
- Slower processor (Unisoc T7200)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Faster processor (Snapdragon 750G)
- Faster charging (33W, 58 min)
- Likely better camera performance
- Shorter battery life (estimated)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so we must infer. Both phones likely feature LCD panels given their price point. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, being a slightly more premium offering, may have a higher peak brightness and potentially a higher refresh rate. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be standard for this segment. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means variable refresh rates are unlikely.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. We can assume both phones feature multi-camera setups, but without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G likely has a more sophisticated image processing pipeline, leveraging Qualcomm’s ISP. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, a common feature in this price range, would give it an edge in low-light photography and video recording. We can expect the Redmi to deliver more consistent image quality across various lighting conditions.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) demonstrably outperforms the Doogee Blade20’s Unisoc T7200 (12nm) chipset. The 750G’s Kryo 570 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a significant CPU performance advantage over the T7200’s 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Doogee’s octa-core configuration is respectable, it can’t match the architectural advantages of Qualcomm’s design.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade20’s 85-hour endurance is its standout feature. This is achieved despite a likely smaller battery capacity than the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, thanks to the efficiency of the Unisoc T7200 and optimized software. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G compensates with 33W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 58 minutes. The Doogee Blade20’s 18W charging is significantly slower. The Blade20’s 1100 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself, mitigating degradation over time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade20 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and you aren’t concerned with having the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you prefer a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming, and you want to minimize downtime with its 33W fast charging capability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How will the Unisoc T7200 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile on the Doogee Blade20?
While the Unisoc T7200 can run PUBG Mobile, expect to play at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G will provide a smoother experience with higher graphical settings and fewer frame drops.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G a significant advantage over the Doogee Blade20’s 18W charging?
Yes, the 33W charging is a substantial benefit. Reaching 100% in 58 minutes is considerably faster than the Doogee Blade20, making it ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Will the Doogee Blade20’s battery hold its charge well over a year of use, given its 1100 charge cycle rating?
The 1100 charge cycle rating is a strong indicator of long-term battery health. It suggests the battery will retain a significant portion of its capacity even after extensive use over several years, outperforming phones with lower cycle ratings.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 750G in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 750G supports carrier aggregation, which combines multiple 5G channels to deliver significantly faster download and upload speeds where available from your carrier. This is a key advantage for users in areas with robust 5G infrastructure.
