Doogee Blade20 Turbo vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Doogee Blade20 Turbo emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 85-hour endurance rating and 1100 charge cycles offer peace of mind. However, if rapid charging is paramount, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+'s 120W charging, promising a full charge in just 19 minutes, is undeniably appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade20 Turbo | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 174 x 81.2 x 15.8 mm (6.85 x 3.20 x 0.62 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 333 g (11.75 oz) | 208.4 g (7.34 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | 10300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Desert Titanium, Black | Arctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition |
| Models | - | 22101316UCP, 22101316UG |
| Price | About 320 EUR | $ 348.00 / £ 439.00 / € 399.00 / ₹ 29,949 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 498710 (v9) GeekBench: 2208 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 85:12h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Blade20 Turbo
- Exceptional 85-hour battery endurance
- Impressive 1100 charge cycles for long-term battery health
- Mediatek Dimensity 7050 offers solid performance
- Slower 33W charging
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially lacking AMOLED quality
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (19 minutes to 100%)
- Likely superior display quality with 'Infinite' contrast ratio
- Potentially slightly better GPU performance with Dimensity 1080
- Shorter battery endurance (88 hours)
- Battery cycle life not specified, potentially lower than Doogee
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a high-quality AMOLED panel, though specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are absent. The Blade20 Turbo’s display specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given its price point, it likely utilizes an LCD panel, potentially sacrificing the vibrant colors and deep blacks of an AMOLED display. The Redmi Note 12 Pro+ likely offers a more visually immersive experience, assuming its contrast ratio translates to excellent real-world performance.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro+’s camera system is not detailed in the provided data, but the 'Photo / Video' designation suggests a focus on image and video capture. The Blade20 Turbo’s camera specifications are also missing. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience, given Xiaomi’s reputation in this area, but this remains speculative without further details.
Performance
Both the Doogee Blade20 Turbo and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ are powered by octa-core CPUs featuring the same core configuration: 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the chipsets differ – the Blade20 Turbo uses the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm), while the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ utilizes the Dimensity 1080 (6nm). While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 1080 generally offers a slight performance edge in GPU-intensive tasks. The lack of RAM specifications for the Blade20 Turbo makes a definitive statement difficult, but assuming comparable RAM (likely LPDDR4X or LPDDR5), the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ should deliver a marginally smoother experience in demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
This is where the two phones truly diverge. The Doogee Blade20 Turbo boasts an impressive 85-hour endurance rating and a remarkable 1100 charge cycles, indicating exceptional battery longevity and resistance to degradation. In contrast, the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ offers 88 hours of endurance, a slight improvement, but its key feature is the blazing-fast 120W wired charging, advertised to reach 100% in just 19 minutes. The Blade20 Turbo’s 33W charging is significantly slower. This difference caters to distinct user preferences: the Doogee prioritizes long-term battery health and sustained use, while the Redmi emphasizes convenience and rapid replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade20 Turbo if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day – and beyond – of heavy use, and value long-term battery health. It’s ideal for travelers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+ if you prioritize the convenience of incredibly fast charging and are willing to trade some battery endurance for it. This phone is best for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost.