Doogee Blade20 Turbo vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Value and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and a polished software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. However, the Doogee Blade20 Turbo offers significantly longer battery life and comparable performance for demanding tasks, making it a compelling choice for power users and gamers on a budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade20 Turbo | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 174 x 81.2 x 15.8 mm (6.85 x 3.20 x 0.62 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 333 g (11.75 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~74.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.5", PDAF 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1" | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 10300 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Desert Titanium, Black | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 85:12h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Blade20 Turbo
- Exceptional battery life (85h endurance)
- Fast 33W wired charging
- Powerful Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Camera likely inferior to Pixel 7a
- Software experience may not be as refined
Google Pixel 7a
- Excellent camera quality and image processing
- Smooth software experience with guaranteed updates
- Bright and vibrant display
- Slower 18W charging
- Shorter battery life compared to Doogee
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a brighter display, peaking at 1070 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors. While the Blade20 Turbo’s display specs are not provided, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel offers superior contrast and color accuracy. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (assumed based on market segment) provides a smoother scrolling experience than the likely 60Hz panel on the Doogee, though the impact is subtle for many users. The Pixel 7a’s smaller size may also appeal to those preferring a more pocketable device.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 7a excels in both photo and video capture, offering features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The Doogee Blade20 Turbo’s camera specs are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s image processing capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s focus on software-driven image enhancement gives it a significant edge.
Performance
The Google Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, offers a performance advantage over the Doogee’s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.85 GHz, provides a noticeable boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. However, the Dimensity 7050’s octa-core configuration, with its two Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz, is still highly capable, and the 6nm process helps with efficiency. The Pixel 7a benefits from Google’s software optimizations, but the Blade20 Turbo’s raw processing power is competitive, especially considering its price point. The Pixel 7a likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade20 Turbo dominates in battery endurance with an impressive 85-hour rating and a remarkable 1100 charge cycles, suggesting exceptional longevity. This is significantly higher than the Pixel 7a’s 76-hour rating. While the Pixel 7a offers wireless charging (7.5W) and PD3.0 support, the Blade20 Turbo compensates with 33W wired charging and reverse wired charging. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging is considerably slower, meaning the Blade20 Turbo will reach a full charge much faster, despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade20 Turbo if you need exceptional battery endurance – its 85-hour rating and 1100 charge cycles are unmatched in this price range – and prioritize raw processing power for gaming or multitasking. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a superior camera system, seamless software updates, and a more refined user experience, even if it means sacrificing some battery life and charging speed.