Doogee Blade10 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Budget and Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth experience, fast charging, and a superior display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. While the Doogee Blade10 offers impressive battery endurance, its older chipset and less refined features can't compete with Xiaomi's offering.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade10 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 10.7 mm thickness | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 240 g (8.47 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Camouflage | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | - | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:50h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Blade10
- Exceptional battery endurance (50:50h)
- High battery cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Outdated Unisoc T606 chipset
- Likely inferior display quality
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Bright and vibrant display (1283 nits)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 19 min)
- Shorter battery endurance (10:38h)
- Potentially higher price
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ immediately pulls ahead with its significantly brighter display, peaking at a measured 1283 nits. This translates to excellent visibility outdoors, a stark contrast to the likely lower peak brightness of the Doogee Blade10 (spec not provided). While the Blade10’s panel specifics are unknown, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s brightness and likely higher color accuracy will provide a far more immersive viewing experience. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely utilizes a higher refresh rate panel as well, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Doogee Blade10, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, likely with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. While the Blade10 may offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will likely excel in low-light scenarios and offer greater detail and dynamic range. We'll assume the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has OIS, a feature likely absent on the Blade10.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, represents a significant leap over the Doogee Blade10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s Cortex-A715 cores, clocked at 2.8 GHz, offer considerably more processing power than the Blade10’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will likely support faster RAM (LPDDR5x) further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade10 boasts a claimed 50:50h endurance and 1000 charge cycles, suggesting exceptional longevity. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ compensates for potentially lower endurance (10:38h active use) with its blazing-fast 120W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. This dramatically reduces downtime and offers a convenience the Blade10 simply can’t match. While the Blade10’s long-term battery health is a plus, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s rapid charging is a game-changer for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade10 if you absolutely prioritize maximum battery life and are comfortable with a more basic user experience. It’s ideal for users who primarily need a reliable communication device and don’t heavily rely on demanding apps or games. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you value a bright, high-quality display, significantly faster performance for multitasking and gaming, and the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging. This phone is geared towards users who want a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank.