Poco X6 Pro vs Doogee Blade10: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides a substantial performance leap over the Doogee Blade10’s Unisoc T606, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. However, the Doogee Blade10’s impressive battery endurance and 1000 cycle lifespan are compelling for users prioritizing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade10 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 10.7 mm thickness | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 240 g (8.47 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Camouflage | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:50h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Blade10
- Exceptional battery endurance (50:50h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Affordable price point (implied)
- Outdated Unisoc T606 chipset
- Likely dim display
- Limited camera capabilities
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Fast 67W charging
- Bright and vibrant display (1148 nits)
- Shorter battery endurance compared to Doogee Blade10
- Potentially higher price
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly more advanced display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1148 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Doogee Blade10, which lacks specific brightness data but is likely considerably dimmer. While the Blade10’s panel type isn’t specified, the X6 Pro’s brightness suggests a higher-quality IPS or AMOLED panel. The absence of refresh rate information for the Blade10 further highlights the X6 Pro’s likely superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the Doogee Blade10’s camera is limited, making a detailed comparison difficult. The Poco X6 Pro’s camera system, while details are missing, is expected to offer a more versatile experience. The X6 Pro’s chipset includes a powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) capable of handling complex image processing tasks. The absence of sensor size or aperture information for the Blade10 suggests a more basic camera setup, likely focused on casual photography. We can assume the X6 Pro will offer superior low-light performance and video recording capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-A715 core clocked at 3.35 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Doogee Blade10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A75 and A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity chip translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, enabling sustained performance during intensive tasks. The X6 Pro’s CPU architecture is also more modern, offering improved instruction set efficiency.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro offers a 67W wired charging solution with support for QC2.0 and PD3.0, achieving a 100% charge in just 45 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Doogee Blade10, which lacks fast charging specifications. While the Blade10 claims 50:50h endurance and a 1000 cycle lifespan, the X6 Pro’s active use score of 11:46h demonstrates competitive real-world battery performance. The Blade10’s longevity claim is appealing, but the X6 Pro’s rapid charging mitigates the inconvenience of more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade10 if you need a reliable, long-lasting phone for basic tasks and prioritize battery life above all else. It’s a solid choice for users who primarily browse, communicate, and occasionally use social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, and content creation, and value fast charging and a brighter display.