Doogee Blade10 vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison of Performance, Camera, and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality, software experience, and overall performance, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. However, the Doogee Blade10 excels in battery endurance and offers a compelling option for those on a strict budget who prioritize longevity over cutting-edge features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade10 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 10.7 mm thickness | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 240 g (8.47 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Camouflage | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:50h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Blade10
- Exceptional battery endurance (50:50h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Very affordable price point
- Significantly weaker performance
- Inferior camera quality
- Less refined software experience
Google Pixel 7a
- Powerful Google Tensor G2 processor
- Excellent camera with Google’s image processing
- Bright and vibrant display
- Shorter battery life compared to Doogee Blade10
- Higher price point
- May experience some throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1070 nits, which translates to excellent visibility outdoors, a feature the Doogee Blade10’s specifications don’t address. While the Blade10’s display resolution isn’t specified, it’s likely lower than the Pixel 7a’s, impacting sharpness. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel also offers superior contrast and color accuracy, crucial for media consumption. The absence of display specs for the Blade10 suggests a focus on cost reduction rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a major differentiator. While specific sensor details are missing, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image processing. The Doogee Blade10’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a meaningful comparison, but given its price point, it’s unlikely to compete with the Pixel 7a’s image quality. The Pixel 7a also offers advanced video capabilities, further widening the gap.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Google Pixel 7a’s Google Tensor G2, built on a 5nm process, features a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz, alongside Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. This architecture delivers significantly faster processing speeds and improved AI capabilities compared to the Doogee Blade10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The T606, with its Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, is geared towards efficiency but lacks the raw power for demanding tasks or intensive gaming. The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 also contributes to better thermal management, reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade10 claims a remarkable 50:50h endurance rating and 1000 charge cycles, suggesting exceptional longevity. This is a key strength, potentially offering years of reliable use. The Pixel 7a, with an older 76h endurance rating, still provides solid battery life, but the Blade10 appears to prioritize longevity. The Pixel 7a supports 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, offering convenient charging options. The Blade10’s charging specifications are not provided, but it likely charges at a slower rate.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade10 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and you're comfortable with a less refined software experience and a more basic camera system. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize a superior camera, smooth performance for demanding apps, timely software updates, and a more polished user interface, even if it means sacrificing some battery life.