Doogee Blade10 Ultra vs Xiaomi 13T Pro: A Deep Dive into Value and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a premium experience, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Doogee Blade10 Ultra, despite the latter’s impressive battery endurance. However, the Blade10 Ultra remains a compelling option for those on a strict budget who prioritize battery life above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade10 Ultra | Xiaomi 13T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 10.7 mm thickness | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 240 g (8.47 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | - | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:50h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Blade10 Ultra
- Exceptional battery endurance (50:50h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Significantly weaker processor
- Limited camera capabilities (assumed)
- Slower charging speeds (unspecified)
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Flagship-level performance (Dimensity 9200+)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (19 minutes to full)
- Bright and vibrant display (1094 nits)
- Shorter battery life compared to Doogee
- Potentially higher price
- Faster battery degradation (due to charging speed)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1094 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Doogee Blade10 Ultra. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Blade10 Ultra’s display specifications are unknown, the 13T Pro’s panel likely benefits from a higher contrast ratio and potentially a higher refresh rate, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the Doogee Blade10 Ultra’s camera is limited, but the Xiaomi 13T Pro is expected to offer a more versatile and capable camera system. While both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the 13T Pro likely benefits from a larger main sensor, advanced image processing algorithms, and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The absence of details regarding the Blade10 Ultra’s sensor size and aperture suggests it will struggle in low-light conditions compared to the 13T Pro. We can assume the 13T Pro will deliver superior image quality and video recording capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Xiaomi 13T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) is a flagship-tier chipset featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, alongside Cortex-A715 and A510 cores. This architecture delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Doogee Blade10 Ultra’s Unisoc T606 (12nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A75 and A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz. The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 9200+ also provides superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. The 13T Pro is the clear choice for gamers and power users.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade10 Ultra claims a 50:50h endurance rating and a 1000-cycle battery lifespan, emphasizing long-term reliability. However, the Xiaomi 13T Pro, despite an active use score of 11:50h and an older endurance rating of 102h, compensates with its blazing-fast 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 19 minutes. This rapid charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Blade10 Ultra may last longer on a single charge, the 13T Pro’s charging speed offers a more convenient user experience, especially for those who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade10 Ultra if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use and value long-term battery health, prioritizing endurance over raw processing power. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you prefer a snappy, responsive experience for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast charging, even if it means more frequent top-ups.