Doogee Blade10 Ultra vs. vivo X90 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and a premium experience, the vivo X90 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and superior gaming capabilities. However, the Doogee Blade10 Ultra provides exceptional battery endurance and represents a compelling value proposition for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade10 Ultra | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 10.7 mm thickness | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 240 g (8.47 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Red |
| Models | - | V2227A |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:50h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Blade10 Ultra
- Exceptional battery endurance (50:50h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- More affordable price point
- Significantly slower processor
- Likely lower-quality display
- Less capable camera system
vivo X90 Pro+
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Rapid charging (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Superior camera capabilities
- Higher price
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Doogee
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
While display specifications for the Doogee Blade10 Ultra are not provided, it's reasonable to assume a standard LCD panel given its price point. The vivo X90 Pro+ likely features a high-resolution AMOLED display, potentially with LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates. This would translate to smoother scrolling, more vibrant colors, and improved power efficiency compared to the Doogee. The X90 Pro+'s panel will also likely achieve significantly higher peak brightness, improving visibility in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Doogee Blade10 Ultra are unavailable, but it's likely to feature a more modest camera setup focused on basic photography. The vivo X90 Pro+ is expected to have a high-end camera system, potentially including a large 1-inch sensor for exceptional low-light performance and detail. While specific sensor sizes and apertures are unknown, the X90 Pro+'s image processing capabilities, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP, will likely deliver superior image quality, dynamic range, and video recording capabilities. The absence of details on the Doogee suggests a focus on functionality over photographic excellence.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The vivo X90 Pro+'s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship chipset built on a cutting-edge process node, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Doogee Blade10 Ultra’s Unisoc T606 (12nm), an octa-core processor geared towards efficiency rather than raw speed. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture – incorporating Cortex-A715, A710, and A510 cores – provides a significant advantage in multi-tasking and demanding applications. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly benefit from the vivo X90 Pro+’s superior processing power.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade10 Ultra boasts a 50:50h endurance rating and a 1000-cycle battery lifespan, indicating a strong emphasis on longevity. While the vivo X90 Pro+'s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging (advertised 100% in 33 minutes) and 50W wireless charging capabilities offer significantly faster replenishment. The Doogee’s endurance suggests a larger battery capacity, optimized for extended use. However, the X90 Pro+'s rapid charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, allowing users to quickly top up when needed. The inclusion of reverse wired charging on the X90 Pro+ adds further versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade10 Ultra if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and prioritize battery life above all else. It’s ideal for travelers, field workers, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you demand the fastest possible performance for gaming, video editing, or demanding applications, and appreciate features like 80W wired and 50W wireless charging for minimal downtime.