Doogee Blade10 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Clash of Priorities
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and value, the Doogee Blade10 Ultra offers an impressive 50:50h endurance and 1000 charge cycles. However, the Google Pixel 8 Pro’s superior processing power, advanced camera capabilities, and software experience make it the clear winner for those willing to invest in a premium smartphone.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade10 Ultra | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 10.7 mm thickness | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 240 g (8.47 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | - | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:50h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Blade10 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (50:50h endurance)
- High charge cycle count (1000 cycles)
- Significantly more affordable
- Less powerful processor
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Slower charging speeds
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Powerful Google Tensor G3 chip
- Advanced camera system with AI features
- Bright and vibrant display (1600 nits)
- Significantly higher price
- Shorter battery life compared to Doogee
- May experience thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 8 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1600 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Doogee Blade10 Ultra’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The Pixel 8 Pro’s panel likely utilizes LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, contributing to power efficiency, a feature absent in the Doogee. The Pixel 8 Pro’s superior display technology translates to a more vibrant and usable experience, especially outdoors.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera system is a major selling point, offering advanced computational photography powered by the Tensor G3. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s image processing algorithms are renowned for their dynamic range and detail. The Doogee Blade10 Ultra’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but given its price point, it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 8 Pro’s image quality or features. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities will also be far superior, benefiting from the Tensor G3’s dedicated image signal processor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 8 Pro’s Google Tensor G3, fabricated on a 4nm process, features a nona-core architecture with a high-performance Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Doogee Blade10 Ultra’s Unisoc T606 (12nm), an octa-core chip with less powerful Cortex-A75 and A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz. The 4nm process of the Tensor G3 provides significantly better power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained high performance. The Pixel 8 Pro will excel in demanding tasks like video editing and gaming, while the Doogee is geared towards everyday use.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade10 Ultra claims a remarkable 50:50h endurance and 1000 charge cycles, suggesting exceptional battery life and longevity. The Pixel 8 Pro, while offering a respectable active use score of 11:14h and an endurance rating of 90h, falls short of the Doogee’s claimed endurance. However, the Pixel 8 Pro compensates with faster charging: 30W wired (50% in 30 minutes), 23W wireless, and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Doogee. The Doogee prioritizes longevity, while the Pixel 8 Pro offers convenience with faster charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade10 Ultra if you need a phone that lasts for days on a single charge, prioritize affordability, and don't require the latest and greatest in processing power or camera technology. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you demand a top-tier camera experience, seamless AI integration, fast performance for demanding tasks, and a premium build quality, and are willing to pay a significant price premium.