Doogee Blade10 Pro vs. vivo X90 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw power and a premium experience, the vivo X90 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly faster performance. However, the Doogee Blade10 Pro excels in battery endurance, offering a compelling option for users who prioritize longevity over speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade10 Pro | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 10.7 mm thickness | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 240 g (8.47 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 5150 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Camouflage | Black, Red |
| Models | - | V2227A |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:50h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Doogee Blade10 Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (50:50h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Affordable price point
- Limited processing power
- Display specifications unknown, likely basic
- Camera performance likely limited
vivo X90 Pro+
- Blazing-fast performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Rapid charging (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Premium display (likely AMOLED with LTPO)
- Higher price tag
- Battery life may be shorter than Blade10 Pro
- Potential for thermal throttling under extreme load
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent for the Doogee Blade10 Pro, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given its price point, it likely features an LCD panel with a standard refresh rate. The vivo X90 Pro+, on the other hand, is expected to have a high-resolution AMOLED display, potentially with LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates up to 120Hz. This would translate to smoother scrolling, more vibrant colors, and improved power efficiency compared to a standard LCD. The X90 Pro+’s display is likely to have significantly higher peak brightness, improving visibility in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Doogee Blade10 Pro are unavailable. The vivo X90 Pro+ is expected to feature a high-end camera system, potentially including a large 1-inch sensor. While specific sensor sizes and apertures are unknown, the X90 Pro+’s image processing capabilities, leveraging the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP, will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The X90 Pro+’s camera system is geared towards enthusiasts and those prioritizing photographic quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Doogee Blade10 Pro utilizes the Unisoc T606, a 12nm chipset with an octa-core configuration featuring Cortex-A75 and A55 cores. While capable for basic tasks, it will struggle with demanding applications and games. Conversely, the vivo X90 Pro+ is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, a 4nm powerhouse. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture – incorporating a Cortex-X3 prime core, Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores, and Cortex-A510 efficiency cores – delivers a massive performance uplift. The 4nm process node also contributes to superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly benefit from the X90 Pro+’s processing capabilities.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade10 Pro boasts a 50:50h endurance rating and a 1000-cycle battery lifespan, indicating exceptional battery life. While the exact battery capacity is unknown, the focus on endurance suggests a large battery optimized for longevity. The vivo X90 Pro+ offers 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% charge in 33 minutes (advertised), and 50W wireless charging. While the X90 Pro+’s charging speed is significantly faster, the Blade10 Pro’s extended battery life may negate the need for frequent charging. The Blade10 Pro prioritizes longevity, while the X90 Pro+ prioritizes convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade10 Pro if you need a phone that lasts all day and beyond on a single charge, and are willing to compromise on processing power for exceptional battery life and affordability. Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you demand the fastest possible performance for gaming, content creation, and multitasking, and value features like rapid charging and a premium build quality.