Doogee Blade10 Max vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Doogee Blade10 Max is the clear winner, boasting an 84:26h endurance rating. However, the Google Pixel 7a delivers a significantly smoother and more responsive experience thanks to the Tensor G2, alongside a superior camera system, making it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade10 Max | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 30 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 15.8 mm thickness | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 326 g (11.50 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 10300 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 84:26h endurance, 1100 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Blade10 Max
- Exceptional battery life (84:26h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1100 cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Significantly weaker processor (Unisoc T606)
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Display likely lacks brightness and smoothness
Google Pixel 7a
- Powerful Google Tensor G2 processor
- Excellent camera system with AI features
- Bright and smooth display (1070 nits)
- Shorter battery life (76h endurance)
- Higher price point
- Charging speed is moderate (18W wired)
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility outdoors. While the Blade10 Max's display specs are unavailable, it's likely to be considerably dimmer. The Pixel 7a's 90Hz refresh rate (assumed based on market segment) provides a smoother scrolling experience compared to the likely 60Hz panel on the Doogee. The Pixel 7a's display technology likely incorporates features like HDR support, absent on the Blade10 Max.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a is expected to excel in camera performance, leveraging Google's computational photography prowess. While specific sensor details are unavailable for the Blade10 Max, it's unlikely to match the Pixel 7a's image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Pixel 7a's image processing algorithms, powered by the Tensor G2, deliver exceptional dynamic range and detail. The Blade10 Max will likely focus on providing a functional camera experience, but won't compete with the Pixel 7a's advanced features like Magic Eraser or Photo Unblur.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Tensor G2 (5nm) is a flagship-class processor with a tri-cluster configuration – 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 – designed for AI and machine learning tasks. This contrasts sharply with the Unisoc T606 (12nm) in the Doogee Blade10 Max, featuring a more modest octa-core setup (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The 5nm fabrication process of the Tensor G2 offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning sustained performance under load will be significantly better on the Pixel 7a. The Pixel 7a's likely LPDDR5 RAM further enhances performance compared to the Blade10 Max's likely LPDDR4X.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade10 Max dominates in battery endurance with an impressive 84:26h rating, and a claimed 1100 charge cycles. This suggests the phone can maintain 80% of its original capacity after extensive use. The Pixel 7a, with a 76h endurance rating, falls short. While the Pixel 7a supports 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, the Blade10 Max's charging specifications are unknown, but likely slower. The Blade10 Max's longevity is a key advantage for users who dislike frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade10 Max if you absolutely need a phone that can last for two full days on a single charge, and your usage is primarily focused on basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a premium camera experience, fast performance for demanding apps, and access to Google's AI-powered features, even if it means charging your phone more frequently.