Doogee Blade GT vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing longevity and minimizing charging frequency, the Doogee Blade GT is the clear winner thanks to its remarkable 30:21h endurance. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo appeals to those who value a brighter display and the convenience of 68W fast charging, even at the cost of battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade GT | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.5 x 10.5 mm (7.03 x 3.29 x 0.41 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 260 g (9.17 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.3, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | - | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 30:21h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Blade GT
- Exceptional battery life (30:21h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1300 cycles)
- Potentially stronger CPU performance with Dimensity 7050
- Slow charging speed (18W)
- Limited display specifications available
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Bright display (1004 nits)
- Fast charging (68W wired, 5W wireless)
- Sleek and modern design
- Significantly shorter battery life (104h)
- Snapdragon 695 may offer less CPU power
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to the Doogee Blade GT (brightness data unavailable). This makes the Motorola more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Motorola’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘Infinite’ (nominal), this is typical marketing language; real-world contrast will depend on the panel technology. The Doogee’s display specifications are currently limited, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel type impossible, but its target market suggests a focus on efficiency rather than premium display features.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is difficult. The absence of specific camera information suggests neither phone is positioned as a photography powerhouse. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially offering better image processing algorithms, but this remains speculative without further data. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The Doogee Blade GT utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration is designed for a balance of performance and efficiency. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo, powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), employs an octa-core CPU with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the Snapdragon 695 offers 5G connectivity, the Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores generally provide a performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks. The 6nm process node in both chipsets suggests comparable thermal efficiency, but the Doogee’s CPU clock speeds indicate a potential for slightly higher sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade GT’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 30:21h. This is dramatically higher than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 104h rating. While the Motorola compensates with 68W wired charging and 5W wireless charging, allowing for a much faster 0-100% charge time, the Doogee’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent charging. The Doogee’s 18W charging is considerably slower, but the massive battery capacity mitigates this drawback. The Doogee also claims 1300 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade GT if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from power outlets. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a more visually vibrant display, appreciate the speed of 68W charging, and prioritize a slimmer, more modern aesthetic.