Doogee Blade GT Ultra vs Xiaomi 13T Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Doogee Blade GT Ultra is the clear winner, boasting a remarkable 30:21h endurance. However, the Xiaomi 13T Pro delivers significantly faster performance thanks to the Dimensity 9200+ and 120W charging, making it ideal for power users and gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade GT Ultra | Xiaomi 13T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.5 x 10.5 mm (7.03 x 3.29 x 0.41 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 260 g (9.17 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/2.8" | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | - | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 480 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 30:21h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Blade GT Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (30:21h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1300 charge cycles)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Less powerful processor
- Limited camera details suggest a less advanced system
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 9200+)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (19 minutes to full)
- Brighter display (1094 nits)
- Much shorter battery life (11:50h active use)
- Potentially faster battery degradation due to fast charging
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1094 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Doogee. This higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Doogee’s display specs are missing, the Xiaomi’s likely utilizes a higher-quality panel given its flagship positioning. We can assume the Xiaomi 13T Pro offers a more vibrant and visually appealing experience, though the Doogee may prioritize power efficiency with a lower-brightness panel.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, the Xiaomi 13T Pro, positioned as a flagship, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. While the Doogee may offer a capable camera, the Xiaomi’s likely superior hardware and software will result in better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of sensor details for the Doogee suggests a focus on cost optimization rather than camera prowess.
Performance
The Xiaomi 13T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ chipset, featuring a 3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, represents a substantial performance leap over the Doogee’s Dimensity 7300. The Cortex-X3 architecture is designed for peak performance, while the Dimensity 7300 relies on Cortex-A78 cores. This difference is evident in CPU benchmarks, with the 13T Pro handling demanding applications and games with greater ease. The Xiaomi also benefits from a more modern CPU core configuration (3x A715 vs 4x A78), improving multi-core performance. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, offering good efficiency, but the 9200+ is optimized for higher sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade GT Ultra’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 30:21 hours. This is significantly longer than the Xiaomi 13T Pro’s active use score of 11:50h and its older endurance rating of 102h. However, the Xiaomi compensates with its blazing-fast 120W charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. The Doogee’s 33W charging is considerably slower. The Doogee also claims 1300 charge cycles, suggesting a longer battery lifespan, while the Xiaomi’s battery health degradation over time is typical for fast-charging devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade GT Ultra if you need a phone that can reliably last through extended periods without access to a charger, or if you value longevity with its 1300 charge cycles. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you prefer a faster, more responsive experience, demand quick charging capabilities (fully charged in under 20 minutes), and frequently engage in demanding tasks like gaming or video editing.