Doogee Blade GT Ultra vs. Samsung Galaxy S23+: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Doogee Blade GT Ultra is the clear winner, offering a staggering 30:21h endurance. However, the Samsung Galaxy S23+ delivers superior processing power with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, making it the better choice for demanding gamers and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade GT Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S23+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 7, 28, 41, 66, 71, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Available. Released 2023, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.5 x 10.5 mm (7.03 x 3.29 x 0.41 in) | 157.8 x 76.2 x 7.6 mm (6.21 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM and eSIM or Dual SIM (2 Nano-SIMs and eSIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 260 g (9.17 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Dual video call, Auto-HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/2.8" | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min (advertised) 15W wireless (Qi/PMA) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Ion 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Phantom Black, Cream, Green, Lavender, Graphite, Lime |
| Models | - | SM-S916B, SM-S916B/DS, SM-S916U, SM-S916U1, SM-S916W, SM-S916N, SM-S9160, SM-S916E, SM-S916E/DS |
| Price | About 480 EUR | $ 780.00 / C$ 1,399.99 / £ 919.08 / € 1,185.89 / ₹ 94,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 111h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1234077 (v9) GeekBench: 5073 (v5.1) GFXBench: 110fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 30:21h endurance, 1300 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Blade GT Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (30:21h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1300 cycles)
- Competitive chipset (Dimensity 7300) for the price
- Charging speed is slower (33W)
- Software experience may be less refined
Samsung Galaxy S23+
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Fast charging (45W wired, 15W wireless)
- Premium build quality and software experience
- Significantly shorter battery life (111h endurance)
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S23+ benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, boasting an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, implying excellent black levels and vibrant colors. While the Doogee Blade GT Ultra’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be a standard AMOLED panel. The S23+'s likely inclusion of LTPO technology allows for dynamic refresh rate scaling (1-120Hz), conserving battery life when static content is displayed – a feature absent in the Doogee based on available data. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for the Doogee, but Samsung typically excels in these areas.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, given Samsung’s history, the S23+ likely features a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors, advanced image processing algorithms, and optical image stabilization (OIS) on the main lens. The Doogee Blade GT Ultra may rely more on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. Without specific sensor sizes and aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but Samsung’s experience in mobile photography gives it a likely edge.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) in the Galaxy S23+ represents a significant leap in performance over the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) found in the Doogee Blade GT Ultra. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core alongside Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores – is architecturally superior to the Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 and A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. While both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, Qualcomm’s architecture and optimizations provide a clear advantage. The S23+ also benefits from faster RAM (likely LPDDR5x) which further enhances responsiveness.
Battery Life
This is where the Doogee Blade GT Ultra truly shines. Its 30:21h endurance rating dwarfs the Samsung Galaxy S23+'s 111h. While the S23+ has a larger battery capacity (likely around 4700mAh, based on market segment), the Doogee’s optimized power efficiency and potentially less demanding chipset allow it to last significantly longer on a single charge. The S23+ compensates with faster charging – 45W wired (advertised 65% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless – while the Doogee is limited to 33W wired. The Doogee’s impressive 1300 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade GT Ultra if you need exceptional battery life, prioritize longevity with its 1300 charge cycles, and are comfortable with a potentially less polished software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23+ if you prefer a premium, refined experience, demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value features like wireless charging and a more established brand reputation.