Doogee Blade GT Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Doogee Blade GT Pro is the clear winner. Its exceptional 35:55h endurance rating significantly outpaces the Xiaomi 13T Pro’s 11:50h active use score. However, if raw performance and rapid charging are paramount, the Xiaomi 13T Pro delivers a superior experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Doogee Blade GT Pro | Xiaomi 13T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 178.5 x 83.5 x 10.5 mm (7.03 x 3.29 x 0.41 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 265 g (9.35 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/2.8" | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | - | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 340 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 35:55h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Doogee Blade GT Pro
- Exceptional battery life (35:55h endurance)
- Long battery lifespan (1400 charge cycles)
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful processor
- Display specs are unknown, potentially lower quality
- Camera system likely less advanced
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 9200+ chipset
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Bright and likely high-quality display (1094 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life (11:50h active use)
- Potentially higher price
- Faster battery degradation with frequent fast charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1094 nits, compared to the Doogee Blade GT Pro’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Doogee’s display specs are missing, the Xiaomi’s likely utilizes a higher-quality panel, potentially with features like LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to improved power efficiency. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for the Doogee, but the Xiaomi 13T Pro is expected to deliver a more refined visual experience.
Camera Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro is expected to offer a more versatile and capable camera system, though specific details are missing. The Doogee Blade GT Pro’s camera specs are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given the Xiaomi 13T Pro’s positioning, it likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) and advanced image processing algorithms. The Xiaomi’s focus on both photo and video capabilities suggests a more refined overall camera experience, while the Doogee may rely on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less advanced hardware.
Performance
The Xiaomi 13T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Doogee Blade GT Pro’s Dimensity 7025 (6nm). The 9200+ features a prime Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.35 GHz, offering significantly faster single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth multitasking. The Dimensity 7025’s Cortex-A78 cores, while capable, are less efficient and slower. The 4nm process node of the 9200+ also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The Xiaomi’s likely LPDDR5X RAM further enhances data transfer speeds, complementing the powerful chipset.
Battery Life
The Doogee Blade GT Pro’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 35:55h rating. This is significantly longer than the Xiaomi 13T Pro’s 11:50h active use score and even its older 102h endurance rating. While the Xiaomi 13T Pro compensates with incredibly fast 120W wired charging (0-100% in 19 minutes), the Doogee’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent charging. The Doogee’s 1400 charge cycles suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself, resisting degradation over time. The Xiaomi’s faster charging is convenient, but the Doogee’s endurance offers a different kind of peace of mind.
Buying Guide
Buy the Doogee Blade GT Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through extended periods without access to a charger – ideal for travelers, outdoor enthusiasts, or anyone who dislikes daily charging. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you prefer a phone that can handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing with ease, and you value the convenience of a full charge in under 20 minutes.